[fg2011]

Hi, could you please help thefixed unit costs were given per unit or in total in uestion 1? I misinterpereted the data and thought they were in given per unit – if it is not so will i be given marks per calculation in part “i”?or not? what marks?

[fg2011]

<cite> @mohsinahmed said:</cite>
No bro you made a mistake.
actual proforma is:
FV of consideration at date of acquisition
+ FV of NCI
– FV of net assets at acquisition date
total goodwill

yes, it is proforma for goodwill measured at FV
But I am talking about partial goodwill method (which was used in part A of question 1)

That is why i am asking –
Will I be given full marks for calculation under Partial method of goodwil if I used the following proforma –
consideration paid
+ plus NCI share of net assets at acqusition date
– minus all net assets of subs at acquision date
I have found that in some answers the following proforma is given for partial method of goodwil

consideration paid
– minus parent share of subs net assets at acquision date
The answer will be the same but I am worring about the the proforma which I used for partial goowill metod

THANK YOU!!!

[fg2011]

<cite> @saiyan2005 said:</cite>
think we have the same ans but not for impairment though

Dear friends could you help me?
Will I be given full marks for calculation under partial method of goodwil if I used the following proforma –
consideration paid
+ plus NCI share of net assets at acqusition date
– minus all net assets of subs at acquision date
I have found that in some answers the following proforma is given for partial method of goodwil
consideration paid
– minus parent share of subs net assets at acquision date
The answer will be the same but I am worring about the the proforma which I used
consideration paid
+ NCI share of net assets at acqusition date (NCI % multiplied by net assets at acqusition date)
– all net assets of subs at acquision date
Please, tell me what do you think?

[fg2011]

Dear friends could you help me?

Will I be given full marks for calculation under partial method of goodwil if I used the following proforma –

consideration paid
+ plus NCI share of net assets at acqusition date
– minus all net assets of subs at acquision date

I have found that in some answers the following proforma is given for partial method of goodwil
consideration paid
– minus parent share of subs net assets at acquision date

The answer will be the same but I am worring about the the proforma which I used

consideration paid
+ NCI share of net assets at acqusition date (NCI % multiplied by net assets at acqusition date)
– all net assets of subs at acquision date

Please, tell me what do you think?

[fg2011]

And what about q1 redundacy costs – I included in provision for plan 1 all expenses except for retraining; for year 2 I discounted the provision for 2 years (5% rate was given) and recorded as long term provision – is it OK? Will I begiven full marks for this part?

And q3 once again Leasing of land
I classified land as operating lease but now I think that it was finance lease….
Even if I classifiedthe lease in a wrong way but wrote 10 sentences (about 5-7 ideas) will I be given 4-5 marks, even if my decision to classify lease as an operating lease was wrong?

What do you think? Will the markers mark my answer which states that it is operating lease ?

[fg2011]

Hello! friends, pls, help me!
1) Q1
-redundacy costs – I included in provision for plan 1 all expenses except for retraining; for year 2 I disounted the provision for 2 years (5% ategiven) and recorded as lontermprovision – is it OK? Will I begiven full marks for this part?

2) Q3
Leasing of land
I classified land as operating lease
-indefinite life of land
-the owner has the right to adjust the amount of the rentals (5% to current value)
– no control is pased ;risks and rewards and so on
i listed 5 complete ideas and now I think that it was finance lease – will I be given marks if I classified land as operating lease in this question?
Could you please help me/
Thank you!!!

[Author]

Posts