[emmahumphrey1994]

I said that a provision should be included because although there was no legal obligation, there was still a constructive obligation but I am probably completely wrong!

@ritaalbu said:
What did you say in Q3 – b, recognizing the provision? and indicator of impairment?
I said do not recognize the 3m provision as there is no obligation, and decline in price is an external indicator of impairment ..

[emmahumphrey1994]

I said that a provision should be included because although there was no legal obligation, there was still a constructive obligation but I am probably completely wrong!

[emmahumphrey1994]

Yep I have just sent a complaint via email. This was so unfair that students put so much time and effort into the exam to then be faced with an exam like this!

[Author]

Posts