Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- October 10, 2011 at 10:30 pm #88559
You can use any one you are used to. I like casio scientific calculator due to it’s extra functions.
October 10, 2011 at 9:57 pm #88645Just email them or call them I’m sure they’ll help you on this.
October 10, 2011 at 9:44 pm #88671It’d be ok If you cover the revision kit completely but still you need to see the text book. I presume that the knowledge you already have is based on your T10 paper from CAT, which is not enough for ACCA F9. At least the last three parts can’t be done from the kit because they are not in T10 and for example in Cost of Debt Capital there are multiple ways to solve some of the costs depending upon their nature. Which is difficult to understand from the kit. And there is also additional topic in Sources of Finance “Islamic Finance”.
So, my suggestion is that you atleast buy the text book and go through it briefly before or during you kit practice of a particular topic.
September 30, 2011 at 3:40 pm #88498Just Name them 🙂
September 27, 2011 at 1:06 am #88288Can you please tell us about your study and exam approach, what books you are using? Then may be we can help you in a better way.
September 27, 2011 at 12:38 am #87433And also it’s better to write a little about a lot of points than write a lot about a few points. And attempt only the questions you know you can do correctly then the questions you have doubt and don’t bother with the questions or parts you don’t know at all unless you have plenty of extra time.
September 18, 2011 at 8:23 pm #88225Is The question you’ve given above complete and same as the one in the book?
And could you please check if there are any other notes or workings given for cost of the Machine. I don’t have that book otherwise I would’ve done it my self.September 15, 2011 at 10:39 pm #88171That’s good news. Any ways you r welcome!
September 15, 2011 at 8:18 pm #88169Year; Calculation. =Actual dividend ••••••Actual Growth
2000; 1.7*100/100 =1.70 •••••••••••••••••••••00%
2001; 2.2*100/105= 2.10•••••••••••••••••••••• 23.5%
2002; 2.2*100/110= 2.00 ••••••••••••••••••••••-4.76%
2003; 2.3*100/113 =2.04 ••••••••••••••••••••••2%
2004; 2.8*100/117= 2.40 ••••••••••••••••••••••17.64%September 15, 2011 at 8:13 pm #88168I don’t have that kit and haven’t covered the topic yet.
Still what seems here is that you have to find the value of dividend while allowing for inflation.
So, the answer below might be wrong but you can take it as a suggestion
Taking 2000 as a base year:-Year Calculation. Actual dividend Actual Growth
2000 1.7*100/100 1.70 00%
2001 2.2*100/105 2.10 23.5%
2002 2.2*100/110 2.00 -4.76%
2003 2.3*100/113 2.04 2%
2004 2.8*100/117 2.40 17.64%September 15, 2011 at 6:43 pm #88166Which topic does this question belong?
And which book or notes?September 15, 2011 at 2:20 pm #88159Follow this link
https://opentuition.com/?download=9September 15, 2011 at 2:11 pm #88007Could you please tell us which topic it relates to
@abdulwahabsiddiq said:
Q: 1 is that a criticism that the asset replacement ignores the change in revenue and direct production cost?September 15, 2011 at 2:07 pm #87906Practice review repeat review ask discuss repeat revise remember.
I’ve never done this my self but it’s the best possible solution for any difficulty in ACCASeptember 15, 2011 at 2:01 pm #88038The assumption here is not just an arbitrary assumption. It’s based upon a principle which is explained in the following example:
Suppose we’ve placed an order of 30 units of a given raw materials.
It’s usage is 1 unit per day
And there is no safety inventory
Now,
At the point of delivery there are 30 units in the store
After five days we’d have consumed five units so we’ve 25 units remaining
Ten days from delivery we’ve 20 remaining
15 days later 15 units
……
At the end of the 30th day we’ve no units leftIf we take average of the no of units on each day it’ll give us exactly the half of the order quantity.
I hope it helps.September 10, 2011 at 9:00 pm #87938So, what’s ur plan ?
- AuthorPosts