Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Hello! I am doing PM exam in June 2025, looking for a study partner from Stamford hill / Golders Green…
Thanks!
Hi,
Than you for your fast response always!
Not sure if this is the right place to post my QUESTION!
I am doing my law exam on Wednesday, and need to book an exam for JUNE.
I do not know which order is best, what exam is easiest to clear in just 1 Month???
Please respond quickly!!!!
Thank you for your explanation! I think I understand it almost completely…
Is there an error in the mock? The phrase “entitled substantially all the money…” makes it false as far as I understand…
3 of the options, I had to pick 2. Mock said 1 & 2 are correct. I picked 1 & 3. Is it a mistake in the mock?
1) The wall is only 5/6 of the contracted height so the court will likely direct that Athena should pay only 5/6 of the contract price
2) Even though Panagiotis has failed to perform in accordance with the contract, he has nevertheless rendered substantial performance so should be entitled to substantially all the money agreed in the contract
3) Because the cost of demolition and reconstruction will be disproportionate when compared with the loss of pleasure resulting from the continuing visibility of the rubbish tip, the court will not grant an order in favour of Athena
Thanks for all your help!
Can’t that lead to danger “as 1 partner take control, they begin to change the rules, taking more for themselves and forcing other animals/partner to work harder.
You know the example of a contract to build a wall… built to low… didn’t block the rubbish…now in mock gave a statement:
“Even though Panagiotis has failed to perform in accordance with the contract, he has nevertheless rendered substantial performance so should be entitled to substantially all the money agreed in the contract.”
This statement is correct.Does this mean he was able to build the wall to low and then be paid the full amount anyway??
Oh, right (both comments),
Choose whether the statement is true or false:
“In a partnership registered under limited partnership act 1907, the firm and its members are legally separate.”True / False
Why is it false, if there is no limited liability then what is the benefit???
Just the last bit got me confused, debentures rights when company defaults are that can apply for liquidation order, admin order and appoint a receiver.
Can shareholders or directors not do some of these?