• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

dkbel25

Profile picture of dkbel25
Active 6 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 6
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 14, 2019 at 12:37 am #501386
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    50 😀 , lucky boy.

    December 10, 2018 at 10:59 am #488680
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @himayat said:
    In question 2 in all three step forward future and option i divide how many number deduct please help me

    You were supposed to multiply as the transaction was CHF and the rate was 1 CHF : 1.03 USD so therefore you multiply.

    Don’t worry about it though, if you did all the following steps right, even with incorrect figures, you’ll probably only lose about 2 marks. We only need 50% of the marks 🙂

    December 8, 2018 at 3:40 pm #488487
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @stonecold said:
    My APV was also 157m
    Regarding first question, Tai was perpetuity but I think the combined was not as combined was growing at 4.2% after the 4th year

    Combined value you needed to get the free cash flow for each of first 4 years. yeah 5+ was a growing perpetuity so needed to get this and discount at previous years discount rate and add the 5 amounts together for combined value. Multiply this by 60% for the equity value.

    December 8, 2018 at 12:50 pm #488454
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    For the share offer it said Tai got 55.5% of synergy benefit and Chao 44.5%. Was that overall equity benefit or a per share benefit? I read it as overall equity. If that was Correct it was a lot better for Tai shareholders as they got more than half the benefit and a lot less shares to share it out between.

    December 8, 2018 at 1:22 am #488368
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @niccpx said:
    I calculated value of Tai co using free cash flow method, and deducted 400m debt (market value) to get value of equity of Tai co. And took this figure to divide by number of shares. Share price of Tai co is $3.80, if not mistaken

    I did the same though got a different answer.

    The value if equity in Chao was simple, basically given. Share price given × no. of shares.

    The value of equity in Tai was a FCFF and then take away the debt figure.

    The combined company was a FCFF also but cash flows over a number if years and a deferred growing perpetuity. 60% is equity so this equity value.

    For the share premium question the cash offers were pretty straight forward (I think).

    The shareoffers were confusing and I’m sure I got them wrong but hopefully got a few marks along the way.

    The mixed offer mentioned that the shares would be 2.60 after, so is this the value of Chao shareholder after? Seems to straight forward but it basically says this is the value. Tai value would be the 2.60 plus the cash offer per share, is this right?

    It’s a pity we don’t get to keep the question sheets, I wouldn’t mind having a look.

    December 7, 2018 at 5:29 pm #488280
    mysterydkbel25
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    in Q3 B – I was confused what they were asking about. I wrote about optimal capital structure and M&M theory mainly. Was that anyway relevant?

    In Q3 A – There was no mention of capital allowances or depreciation (or else I missed it). Were we to assume there was some as investment reaidual value was a lot lower than investment. Also was this residual inflation adjusted.

    Overall I found the exam ok ish but was sometimes I thought the information giving was ambiguous. Like Q1 said something like net assets and working capital were 23m, was that between them or each?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nashra30 on CIMA E1 Chapter 3 Test
  • azubair on Financial Performance Measurement – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • j.akshaya on Group SFP – Example (Basic consolidation) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • rishitxx on ACCA BT Chapter 1 – The nature and structure of organisations – Questions
  • singhjyoti on Basic group structures – SPLOCI introduction and example – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in