Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 4, 2013 at 7:48 pm #129183
But 25k is for the full year so I did CA for 12/13 then did it again for the 2 months 13/14 but then apportioning it for 2 months 2/12. Probably wrong!
June 4, 2013 at 4:50 pm #129065I answered this question twice. I used FII and then I didn’t!! So I hope I get marks for the one I did. They can’t mark down for doing a question twice can they?
June 4, 2013 at 4:46 pm #129059Did anyone add FII to the corp tax question?
June 4, 2013 at 4:35 pm #129040I did a question twice giving two different answers cuz I wasn’t sure which method to use for the company one. Will I get penalised for it?
June 4, 2013 at 4:18 pm #129005Did anyone use the NRB given in question 5? I didn’t as I was a PET and not a CLT.
June 4, 2013 at 4:17 pm #129003<cite> @atab said:</cite>
I calculated it as 10000 x 2.4 = 24,000 cost
annual exemption = 10,600
24,000 + 10,600 = 34,600
34,600 / 4 = 8,650 shares (in order to avoid incurring a gain)That’s exactly what I got. Hope it right!!
June 22, 2012 at 4:46 pm #101162Think ur overanalysing it.. I hope anyway!
That question was definitely about breach of contract and liquidated damages…etc
I can’t think of anything else it could be.
June 18, 2012 at 6:53 pm #101148Are self empolyed entited to notice of termination tho? or redundency?
I hated question 10!
June 18, 2012 at 5:59 pm #101144On the (ENG) Paper Questions, 8, 9 and 10…does anyone know the conclusions??
Question 8 – I think it was about anticipatory breach, damages and liquitable damage clause. For the first part I said that Az cannot claim damages becuase he sold the ship for the same value. For the second part I mentioned penalty clause and said that the clause was invalid as it was too excessive!
Question 9- was this about redundency and unfair dismissal? were they both liable for this? Did anyone mention the self employed/employed test??
Question 10- Directors/fraudulent trading? I messed up on this one.
- AuthorPosts