[carriebradshaw]

thank you 🙂 that’s great

[carriebradshaw]

@marymary said:
81

@marymary said:
81

Wow that is a fantastic result well done, I have failed so many times at f9 how did you do it, what else did u study please give give us some. Tips on approach

[carriebradshaw]

@aasdias said:
Can any one tell me whether we need no consider WIC recovery in yr 4? I ws confused with Director’s comment & did not consider it.
I’m not an expert – but I included the working capital because the director said he didn’t – that didn’t make right! I said that if the working capital remained in the project it would not give the correct npv,as the wc is still in and not a true reflection of the value of the project- I took out wc in year 4 and i rejected the projected. I’m not sure if thats right but thats what i did 🙂

[carriebradshaw]

@gagsingh said:
ALSO,

In question 1, when we were asked to contrast absolutism and relativism, and apply it to Shazia Lo, did anyone use Tuckers 5 questions to evaluate Shazia Lo’s situation?

I used Tuckers framework to evaluate Shazia LO- good a bit confused when pulling all info together. Also did anyone think the chemical spillage into the water environ question, waslike ERin brockovitch lol:)

[Author]

Posts