Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- July 30, 2018 at 7:50 pm #465311
Many thanks Sir.
July 29, 2018 at 11:04 pm #465178Hi Sir,
I hope you are well.
As far as I am aware, there is a change to P5, there is no longer option questions in part 2, therefore all questions are compulsory. I just wonder if my Jun 2018 revision kit is still applicable.
Many thanks
November 11, 2017 at 12:52 am #415182Hi,
When there is no date of the work, we put n.d., but how about the same author published some works that do not have date, do we still add a,b,c…, e.g. n.d.a, n.d.b? I am wondering if it is correct because it looks strange.
Many thanks.
November 9, 2017 at 1:12 am #414923Hello,
When I come to submit my project and I realise there are ‘Supporting documents’ and ‘Submit’ can be clicked in the portal, so which one is for uploading documents for submission. I know this question is a bit silly, but I do not want to click the wrong one. 🙂
Also, do I have to upload mentor’s feedback for each meeting as the evidence of SLS.Many thanks.
November 7, 2017 at 1:13 pm #414687@erumrk, the way I sort the list alphabrtically is by adding a line between each reference, and then the list theoretically has several paragraphs, after that, you can sort it by paragraph.
I hope this is helpful.
November 6, 2017 at 10:15 pm #414613@alejandra, Many thanks for your reply. I am now much clearer, good luck to your project 🙂
November 6, 2017 at 9:01 pm #414603@alejandra Thanks for answering my questions.
Please correct me if I am wrong. For example, M&S published annual report, press and conference presentation in 2016. Do I show (M&S, 2016(a)), (M&S, 2016(b)) and (M&S, 2016(c)) when I cite in the text, then I put full details in the list, for example M&S, 2016(a). annual report. [Online]. Available at: URL (Accessed: date)? Am I correct in saying that?
In addition, is it recommended to show reference list in the same work document as RAP or in a separate one?
Many thanks.
November 6, 2017 at 1:58 pm #414558Hi Trephena,
Thanks for your help.
I have checked the Golden Rules in the home page. However, I still have some questions in regards to Rule 7, I have quoted it below:
‘7. The information provided in the text should be sufficient to locate the exact document It is therefore unacceptable just to list a ubiquitous website address such as http://www.marksandspencer.com If you have used information from a specific document then you need to provide the link for the marker e.g.
https://corporate.marksandspencer.com/investors/153855a7b7b24038920758283d6986fa
The reference in the text may have been (M & S, 2015) and therefore in accordance with Rule 5 you must show M & S (2015) in your reference list but you should follow this with an explanation of what the document is e.g Annual report 2015, followed by the link and the latest date you accessed it. (Note if you used Marks & Spencer in the text then you MUST use Marks & Spencer in your list and not randomly decide to change t to M & S see Rule 5).’On this rule, it says when M&S annual report is used, we show (M&S, 2015) in the text and in the list we add Annual report 2015, link and access date. However, what if there are some other resources from M&S website are used, do we still cite in the text as (M&S, date). The question I tried to ask is whether this will cause confusion. If (M&S, 2015) appears several times in the text, does the marker know which information is refereed. Are we required to show specific information, for example, (M&S press, 2015), (M&S annual report, 2015)?
Sorry for asking this long question, I hope I have made myself clear.
Many thanks.
November 4, 2017 at 5:20 pm #414325Hi,
Please help me with Harvard reference.
When I refer information on the research company website and there is no author, do I treat the company as an author? When I cite into the project, do I just put as (Company’s name, date)?
If the annual report is prepared for financial year 2016 and published in 2017, do I put the year as 2017?
Many thanks
October 27, 2017 at 2:33 pm #413403Hello,
Can anyone please help?
As far as I know, topic 18 doesn’t require a comparator analysis, but is it beneficial to have one in the project? The main bit I am concerning is the word limit. If I add one in my project, I may exceed the limit, by which means I need to delete other stuff.
Many thanks
- AuthorPosts