• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

batman1993026

Profile picture of batman1993026
Active 11 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 10
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 5, 2013 at 5:53 pm #129506
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @tandi said:</cite>
    Wasn’t the fair value BELOW it’s carrying value (3000)? Is this still taken as positive figure like above? If it is then got it wrong.

    I can’t believe I am doing this. I will see the result in August, lol.

    Unfortunately not, the Carrying value will have to be reduced to the fair value, therefore taken away – I made the same mistake and took it as a positive figure!

    June 5, 2013 at 5:41 pm #129501
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @kriselda said:</cite>
    it says that for every share 1000 shares it acquired issued 100 loan note he has acq. 20000×75% x 2/5 as it stated in the beginning that for every 2 shares it acq from subs he issued 5. anyway wish you good luck

    I see where you’re coming from, however do we not acquire 15,000 of the subsidiary shares as we acquired 75%? Therefore would the calculation not be based on the 15,000 shares we have acquired? I think the 2 shares for every 5 is referring to how much we give to the subsidiary in return for the 15k shares…

    June 5, 2013 at 5:36 pm #129500
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    anyone remember the mark allocations for Q2?

    June 5, 2013 at 5:34 pm #129498
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @yando said:</cite>
    This is what I did too..

    I think we should pick up at least 2.5/3 marks from this depending on how marks are allocated, so it’s not all bad!

    June 5, 2013 at 4:42 pm #129467
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @shery92 said:</cite>
    I prepared really well for subsequent events, revenue recognition, frame work etc but was that asked ? ummm NO ! two of the rarest IAS come up as Q4 and Q5, on top of that the weird adjustments in Q1 and Q2 threw me off the tracks. Not even the slighest bit happy about my attempt hope I’ve done enough to get just a pass mark.

    Yeah I agree, some of the adjustments in Q1 & Q2 were rather odd, which ones in particular did you find difficult?

    June 5, 2013 at 4:32 pm #129457
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @donizback said:</cite>
    Hopefully bro, same for me I had this point corrent but some other might be wrong my SOFP didnt balance 😀 anyways best of luck hope you pass 🙂

    Best of luck to you mate!

    June 5, 2013 at 4:31 pm #129456
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @kynhonglongbong said:</cite>
    FV adj is (3000) not 3000
    and Pre acquisition is (4000+2000) = (6000)
    total of FV of NA is 11000

    I think the wording of note 1 threw me off and I don’t have a clue why I added the 3000! Still, only 2/3 marks lost on that calculation at max, should get some carry over marks and marks for calculating consideration

    June 5, 2013 at 4:27 pm #129452
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    <cite> @donizback said:</cite>
    Bro the pre acquisiton Retained Earning will include this year’s 6/12 profit as well so unfortunately you are wrong 🙁

    Unfortunately so, but hopefully should pick up a few marks from the consideration and NCI workings! (touch wood)

    June 5, 2013 at 4:15 pm #129446
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Also Q5 was poorly done, I put the gains on investment into OCI – FML!!!

    June 5, 2013 at 4:13 pm #129445
    mysterybatman1993026
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Messed up the G’will calculation by the sounds of what everyone got!

    Consideration: 12,000
    Loan Notes: 1500
    NCI : 6000
    _____
    19500
    Less:
    Share Cap (20,000)
    Pre Acq ear’ (2000)
    FV Adj 3000
    _____

    G’will 500

    Hopefully should receive some marks from that!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Kakui on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in