Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- September 3, 2020 at 5:38 pm #583287
Thank you.
June 18, 2020 at 3:31 pm #574201okay thank you.
May 6, 2020 at 4:37 am #570107Okay thank you sir.
April 17, 2020 at 12:54 pm #568536okay sure.
April 17, 2020 at 6:37 am #568494Will we be tested on cryptocurrencies ? Because this isn’t in the syllabus but there is a technical article on cryptocurrencies in the ACCA website.
March 31, 2020 at 5:02 am #566213okay thank you.
February 29, 2020 at 2:59 am #563486okay thank you.
February 17, 2020 at 1:02 am #562055Okay. So the $6m cash tax benefit is actually part of the pension payment ? I initially thought it was a seperate component.
The FCF only recorded $27m of payment that’s why they are removing that by adding right ?
February 8, 2020 at 3:19 am #561046okay thanks.
February 7, 2020 at 9:38 am #560999okay got it. Thank you.
February 1, 2020 at 2:48 am #560330Question:
On 30 June 20X7, Banana acquired all of the shares of Melon, an entity which operates in the biotechnology industry. Melon was only recently formed and its only asset consists of a licence to carry out research activities. Melon has no employees as research activities were outsourced to other companies. The activities are still at a very early stage and it is not clear that any definitive product would result from the activities. A management company provides personnel for Melon to supply supervisory activities and administrative functions. Banana believes that Melon does not constitutea business in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations since it does not have employees nor carries out any of its own processes.
Banana intends to employ its own staff to operate Melon rather than to continue to use the services of the management company. The directors of Banana therefore believe that Melon should be treated as an asset acquisition but are uncertain as to whether the International Accounting Standards Board’s exposure draft Definition of a Business and Accounting for Previously Held Interests ED 2016/1 would revise this conclusion.
Discuss whether the directors are correct to treat Melon as a financial asset acquisition and whether the International Accounting Standards Board’s proposed amendments to the definition of a business would revise your conclusions ?
November 23, 2018 at 2:14 am #485555Okay sir. I can also state that since this light bulb sales only represents a small fraction of the supermarkets’ sales, the supermarkets will be less price sensitive to light bulb providers. (Its not an important product to them) So,even though they have a high power to bargain, they are more likely to bargain with food suppliers than light bulb suppliers.
Am i right sir ?
November 18, 2018 at 11:58 am #485130okay sir. But why is a low threat of new entrants considered a attractive industry ?
November 15, 2018 at 1:26 pm #484904okay sir thank you.
November 14, 2018 at 3:27 pm #484811okay sir.
November 14, 2018 at 1:03 pm #484790Okay sir thank you.
November 14, 2018 at 9:51 am #484773These donors contribute to these organisations with the expectations that something good will result such as lives being saved, environment being cleaned up or people being educated.
Although it is not financial, they expect a return from their investment, and will invest elsewhere if their expectations are not met.
Am i right sir ?
November 4, 2018 at 5:49 am #483714Why is the internal audit function important to the internal control system?
November 2, 2018 at 3:53 am #483542Okay thank you sir.
November 1, 2018 at 3:27 pm #483517okay sir. Thank you.
November 1, 2018 at 4:43 am #481358okay thank you.
October 29, 2018 at 3:55 pm #480142In the SBL exam, will be ask to specifically state how to embed risk in to the system or how to embed risk into the culture OR will they just ask in general how to embed risk into the organisation ?
October 29, 2018 at 8:22 am #480107okay sir. thank you
October 25, 2018 at 12:56 pm #479772Thank you sir.
October 25, 2018 at 6:51 am #479723I don’t understand why the CEO Mrs Keefer will affected. Could you explain the point in the answer key regarding Mrs Keefer.
“Directors such as Mrs Keefer are likely to experience a much higher level of investor scrutiny for some time to come and Mrs Keefer herself may not survive in her post. The apparent failure of the Global-bank board in its agency responsibilities is likely to increase the amount of intervention by investors and this will be an inconvenience for the board until such time as investor confidence is fully restored. Benefits such as bonuses may be subject to revisions at general meetings and other directors, seen as complicit in Mr Mineta’s losses, may not survive their next retirement by rotation election.”
Why would she experience a much higher level of investor scrutiny for some time to come and why she may not survive in her post ? Can you also explain the bonus part ?
- AuthorPosts