[aniavoo]

@david1988 said:
What did you put for part d of Q1? The strategic alliance part. I talked around knowledge of markets and dealing with fierce competition, decent market share currently, sharing skills and resources. 3 positives there. Negatives were loss of competitive edge if need to share LED technology, loss of reputation if Flicks wasn’t great – not enough info in the scenario to state either way – further research required. Also talked about creating future potential competition as you are sharing all your ideas.

I believe that was the time when I looked at the clock and the only thing that came to my mind was “oh f**k” so I mentioned very little, mainly disadvantage of having to share profits and since investors are hungry for growth and dividends, that may not work…so your answer looks much more promising!

[aniavoo]

Anyone attempted Q4? I can see a lot of dislike for swim lane charts here, but I think the question was actually quite easy! Tangible benefits were just a couple of calculations that were easy and you can always figure something out with intangible benefits..any thoughts?
Q1 – very lenghty and time management was a massive issue for me. I also picked Q4, mentioned similar things as @david1988 – just confused around benefit realisation review when Iron Way said it’s not their problem – benefit realisation review should be done by who initiated the project – so the council – am I right in saying that? or at least agreed beforehand whose reponsibility is that?
Overall, happy with the paper, but could have done much better if i managed my time differently..

[Author]

Posts