[andjela.petric]

@arvind111 said:
Yep – I assumed it was 4 & 4, because you probably got 2 marks for explaining what a significant component was, and then another 2 for going through the workings on the Sub.

I said we should give guidance to component auditor in relation to materiality and also we should communicate significant risks on Group level so these can be addressed in their testing.. not sure if this is what they asked for

[Author]

Posts