[alinoumanmemon]

Thanks all of you for spending your valuable time to answer me. Let me tell you what i have understood about case law and precedent till date

CASE LAW
It is judge made law consisting of decisions made in the courts.

PRECEDENT
It is judge’s judgement on facts in a case. Binding precedent should form part of ratio and precedents forming part of obiter are not binding. binding precedent is regarding proposition of law not on question of fact i.e if in a case there are two judgements by the judge one on proposition of law and other on question of fact. The judgement regarding proposition of law is ratio and thus binding precedent where as judgement on question of fact is obiter and not binding. There may be more than one precedent from a previous case.

Now this is what i have understood till date.Correct me if I am wrong

[alinoumanmemon]

@werty said:
Case law simply refers to disputes which are settled by the legal system through the workings of the Courts. Each dispute is called a case.

When judges are deciding which party should “win” a case, they have to follow ( with certain exceptions! ) the previous decisions made by judges in earlier case dispute resolution where the facts of the recent case are sufficiently similar to the facts of the earlier case. The principle is called “judicial precedent” and a past exam question read “Judicial precedent is the cornerstone of English Law. Discuss”

This earlier judge’s decision is broken down into two elements – ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. It is only the ratio which is binding on later judges in later similar cases. Obiter is merely persuasive – but not binding.

So – “case law” refers to cases brought before the Courts

Precedent is the principle which makes judges follow the principles of law established in earlier similar cases.

Does that help?

I have few questions regarding your above reply

1. What is meant by dispute resolution?
2. While mentioning judicial precedent you have mentioned “decision”, is this final decision of the case or decision of the judge on a fact please clarify.
3. Are case law and precedent principally the same things i.e case law is broad and precedent is part of it?

[alinoumanmemon]

well if both are decisions then what is the difference. If we take an illustration as A & B enter a contract B commits breach of contract, the judge gives his decision now in this illustration what will be case law and precedent.

[Author]

Posts