First of all, thank you very much for your teaching — it has been extremely helpful. When watching the video, I wasn’t able to understand why the calculation uses the fraction 6660/8820, so I tried using an AI tool to look for the equation and help explain the logic behind it.
I’m very sorry if my previous message came across as impolite — that was not my intention. However, I’m still unable to fully understand the reason for using the fraction 6660/8820 just from the text alone.
Even so, I have gained a lot of practical concepts and insights from the video materials, and I truly appreciate the work you and your team have put into this.
The lecture is very easy to understand. Thank you OpenTuition. I would like, if there are some more examples similar to OTQs with the different angles of the theory.
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
The actual IRR formula:
IRR=r1+(NPV1 / (NPV1 – NPV2) ) x (r2 – r1)
r1 = the discount rate that less profitable
r2 = the discoutn rate that more profitable
NPV1 = more profitable figure
NPV2 = less profitable figure
The correct IRR for section internal return rate example 2 should be 12.15%
The lecture is correct – do watch it again (and do not simply learn formulae – the exam is concerned with testing your understanding)
Hello Mr. Moffat,
First of all, thank you very much for your teaching — it has been extremely helpful.
When watching the video, I wasn’t able to understand why the calculation uses the fraction 6660/8820,
so I tried using an AI tool to look for the equation and help explain the logic behind it.
I’m very sorry if my previous message came across as impolite — that was not my intention.
However, I’m still unable to fully understand the reason for using the fraction 6660/8820 just from the text alone.
Even so, I have gained a lot of practical concepts and insights from the video materials,
and I truly appreciate the work you and your team have put into this.
@opentuition
NPV value at 15% is -2160 not -8820? is this an error or am I mis understanding?
The -8820 is the change between the NPV @10% (6660) and the NPV @15% (-2160).
The lecture is very easy to understand. Thank you OpenTuition. I would like, if there are some more examples similar to OTQs with the different angles of the theory.
I don’t know what you mean by ‘different angles of the theory’ in relation to the IRR 🙂