OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
Spread the word
If you have benefited from our materials, please spread the word so more students can benefit.
To help us keep materials up to do and add new content you can also donate
October 29, 2019 at 2:10 pm
I am not entirely sure how to interpret the phrase “period when required to live elsewhere”.
From the example it is not obvious whether the fact of moving elsewhere was a individual decision or demand from the employer. Because if it is a first one then the period covered is not deemed as occupied. Or this is not the actual point here?
However it is not really clear for me and it would be great to get an explanation.
August 21, 2019 at 11:37 pm
How did we know it was let for 30 months and actually occupied for 36 months, I get the 3 years part but what about the 33 years part?
July 7, 2019 at 4:32 pm
1/10/1993 – 31/3/2003 lived in it, so actual= 10 years and 6 month = 126 month but why you use 114?
July 11, 2019 at 8:37 pm
Its 9 years till 1st October 2002. Thereafter,its 6 months till 31st March 2003 which is a totall of 114 months
July 11, 2019 at 8:41 pm
Its 9 years till 1st October 2002. Thereafter,its 6 months till 31st March 2003 which is a totall of 114 months. Be careful with the dates and months given
You must be logged in to post a comment.