OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
Get yours with OpenTuition discount code >>
Sign up with YouTube premium to watch our lectures Ad-free and download them to watch offline.
Specially for OpenTuition students
June 30, 2021 at 12:35 pm
Understood that the variances all fit together at the operating statement level but if there are exam questions that just ask about the variances specific on Sales (and not requiring an Operating Statement) then,
For Sales volume variance – is it always the variance on Profit between budget and actual ? Technically can we not analyse the variance between the extra or less Revenue due to the volume change?
For Sales revenue – Can we not analyse variance on Profit level for this one like sales volume?
Thanks and Regards,
John Moffat says
June 30, 2021 at 3:43 pm
The sales volume variance is always the different between the actual sales volume and the budgeted sales volume, costs at either the standard profit or the standard contribution depending on which method of costing is being used.
We never analyse it because there is no point. The purpose of variance analysis is to discover why the actual profit is different from the budgeted profit. If the actual profit is different from the actual sales at standard profit then the reason has to be due to changes in the selling price and/or changes in the costs, and we calculate variances for each of these.
July 2, 2021 at 5:47 am
Thank you Sir, I have a better understanding now.
I have another question please. I see that the cost of the actual ‘extra’ inventory of 500 units (those production units > sales units) are estimated based on standard costing of $68 per unit, and so both flexed budget cost and actual cost of these extra inventories are accounted to be at $34,000. So does this mean that we assume all production cost efficiencies or inefficiencies against flexed budget are all considered in the cost of goods sold?
I just want to ensure my understanding of this assumption is correct. For instance, in a rather unlikely situation, it could be that all of the actual 8,400 units produced for sales incurred costs exactly the same amounts as flexed budget costs, but somehow those extra 500 units in inventory incurred much more costs, which resulted in total production costs of 8,900 units higher than the total flexed budget production costs.
Many thanks in advance!
July 2, 2021 at 7:41 am
We value the inventories at standard cost and so all differences in costs are dealt with in the variances for the period and not carried forward in the valuation of the inventory.
May 8, 2021 at 7:41 pm
While calculating expenditure variance of F.O.H, why the standard cost is not calculated the way we calculated the standard cost of mat., lab., and v.o.h? Why we simply mentioned $130,500 in place of standard cost to calculate variance.
May 9, 2021 at 9:07 am
Because by definition total fixed costs should stay fixed, whatever the level of production.
December 30, 2020 at 10:12 am
Hi John and thanks for a great lecture (as always!). 🙂
I was just curious regarding fixed overheads… You state very clearly that while they should not change, and so should stay fixed, they do change in this example because we are using absorption costing. My question is hypothetical as to how this relates/applies to a real-life situation in for example a business and you’d be asked to calculate the total variances on a flexed budget, and/or analyse them. Would you still flex the FOH?
December 30, 2020 at 3:01 pm
For variance analysis, if we are using absorption costing then using the standard profit per unit when calculating the sales volume variance it automatically flexes the fixed overheads. That is why the fixed overhead variance needs analysing into the expenditure variance (which is meaningful) and the volume variance (which is just to explain the reason for the difference).
In real life it depends on whether the company chooses to use absorption costing or marginal costing – it their choice.
Don’t worry too much – fixed overhead variances are rare in Paper PM because they were examined in Paper MA.
It is the advanced variances in the next chapter that are much more important for Paper PM.
December 30, 2020 at 3:36 pm
That’s great, many thanks ?
December 30, 2020 at 3:37 pm
Meant to say many thanks! ?
June 6, 2020 at 7:52 pm
i have not seen your response sir
October 18, 2019 at 8:12 pm
John. Really enjoying your lectures. This is a fantastic resource and helping me immensely. Thank you so much to you and your team!
October 19, 2019 at 9:25 am
Thank you for your comment 🙂
August 24, 2019 at 4:23 pm
Hi, do we calculate fixed costs variances in the same way using marginal costing? or is this for absorption costing?
August 24, 2019 at 4:35 pm
oh never mind, just saw the separate lecture 🙂
August 24, 2019 at 5:02 pm
That was what I was about to reply to you – I am pleased that you found it 🙂
November 7, 2018 at 9:23 am
Thank you Sir
April 1, 2019 at 6:49 pm
Hi, if you dont mind me asking, did you pass f5? Im planning to sit in June, God willing.
You must be logged in to post a comment.