• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FM:
  • FM Notes
  • FM Lectures
  • FM Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • Revision Mock Exam
  • FM Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. shana123 says

    May 6, 2023 at 6:16 am

    Is expected fixed oh = 140000*35 = 49000 . plz help me solve this answer.

    Log in to Reply
    • a@mer says

      May 19, 2023 at 2:29 pm

      (100k*0.20 + 140k*0.35 + 180k*0.25 + 220k*0.20) = 158,000

      Log in to Reply
  2. mufc96 says

    December 7, 2021 at 9:09 pm

    Hello,

    Why is the PV contribution instead of the PV of the Sales Revenue, to compute the NPV?

    Thank you

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      December 8, 2021 at 6:35 am

      The contribution is the revenue less the variable costs.

      Log in to Reply
  3. k5031146 says

    November 27, 2021 at 5:56 am

    May I ask why shouldn’t we calculate the PV for each year and adding them up? Cause the NPV will be different.

    E.G. 0 yr Cost : (200000)+ 1st yr: (265000-140000)*0.833(cost of capital) + and so on?

    Thank you in advance.

    Log in to Reply
    • k5031146 says

      November 27, 2021 at 6:06 am

      Also, as per the table in the notes, the df@20% should be 2.588 instead of 2.589 (0.830.694+0.579+0.482). Is there any reason to state it as 2.589?

      If I take 2.588 in exam, would it be wrong? Thank you again.

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        November 27, 2021 at 8:26 am

        2.589 is from the annuity tables that are also provided. The difference is simply due to the fact that both sets of tables are rounded to 3 decimal places. If you are unsure about the use of annuity tables then you should watch the earlier lectures (and if necessary the Paper MA (was F2) lectures on discounting, because this is revision from Paper MA).

        By all means discount each flow individually if you prefer. The fact that the answer will be slightly different is irrelevant (both in real life and in exams).You would still get full marks in the exam.

  4. hashirhashmat says

    November 8, 2021 at 3:24 am

    A company is considering an investment of $800,000 in new product. The product is expected to yield incremental net cash flows over the next five years as follows: Year Cash flows ($) Year-1: 175,000 Year2: 225,000 Year3: 340,000 Year4: 165,000 Year5: 125,000 Cash flows are expected to grow at a rate of 3% per year after year five to infinity. Assume a discount factor of 14%. The net present value of the project is?
    A. $430,500
    B. $526,021
    C. $811,412
    D. $650,119

    Answer is B

    Sir I would appreciate if you can explain with detailed working.

    Log in to Reply
    • hashirhashmat says

      November 8, 2021 at 3:30 am

      I am confused about the following part of the answer:
      PV 6 to infinity (125,000 x 1.03)/(0.14 – 0.03) = 1,170,454 x 0.519 = 607,466?

      Full answer is as follows:

      PV 1–5: 718,555?
      PV 6 to infinity (125,000 x 1.03)/(0.14 – 0.03) = 1,170,454 x 0.519 = 607,466?
      Total present value 1,326,021?
      Less initial investment (800,000)
      Net present value 526,021

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        November 8, 2021 at 7:12 am

        You must ask this kind of question in the Ask the Tutor Forum and not as a comment on a lecture.

        As far as the discounting is concerned, this is all explained in later lectures.

  5. tankarki says

    July 15, 2020 at 8:38 am

    Question says Fixed OH to be increase by $140K per year but we have taken $140K per year only ?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      July 15, 2020 at 2:58 pm

      It means (and means in the exam also when phrased this way) that from now on they are $140K per year more than they are now. It does not mean that they go up another $140K every year.

      Log in to Reply
  6. shram says

    June 7, 2020 at 2:44 pm

    Hi sir ,
    For finding contribution,
    Why we have used selling price p.u instead of contribution p.u?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      June 8, 2020 at 10:04 am

      The question says that the contribution is 50% of the selling price and that is what I have done in the lecture.

      Log in to Reply
      • shram says

        June 8, 2020 at 3:18 pm

        Now I am clear.
        Thank you sir.

        I have been confused there because the question said ……contribution of 50%.
        But your statement made me clear (i.e contribution is 50% of selling price).

      • shram says

        June 8, 2020 at 3:21 pm

        I just need to appreciate a lot more for the way of representation of question.

        Otherwise,
        The concept was easy-peasy.

  7. asher2019 says

    May 19, 2020 at 12:10 pm

    Thank you

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in