OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2024 exams. Get your discount code >>
FM Chapter 7 Questions – Investment appraisal – methods
Reader Interactions
Comments
annmary1says
Hi sir, could you please help me solve this question? (a)If a project involved the outlay of $1000 today and provided a definite return of $1001, for the foreseeable future, would you accept it if you could get a return of 5% on investments of similar risk? (b) What if the project gave a return of $1001 per year for a foreseeable future, starting in 3 years time?
Tichtop Ltd is considering investing $80 million in equipment which will generate a net cash flow of $32 million per year for four years. The company is able to depreciate the equipment at rate of 20% per year on a straight line basis for tax purposes. The market value of the equipment at the end of four years is expected to be $30 million. The difference between the market value and the equipment’s tax value is subject to tax. The corporate tax rate is 28% and the company’s cost of capital is 14%.
Calculate: (a) the project’s NPV (b) the project’s IRR (c )the project’s MIRR ( d ) the project’ pay back this is my due assignment and i have no clue on how to write it please help
Sieness is correct – MIRR is not examined in Paper FM.
Also, we do not do assignments for people. If you are taking AFM The new name for Paper P4) and do not understand what is mean by MIRR then watch my free AFM lectures and ask in the AFM Ask the Tutor Forum if anything is not clear (but don’t expect me to do you homework for you!!!)
I do not quite understand Q4 – could you please explain why the statement about a graph with NPV on “Y” and interest rate on “X” – wouldn’t it have a negative slope?
If it is an outflow followed by inflows, then yes – it would have a negative slope. But if, for example, it was an inflow followed by outflows, then it would have a positive slope 🙂
Hello, could you please help me with this investment appraisal -allowing for tax and inflation. If a question reads ( A project has the following projected cash inflows
Year 1 $100,000 Year 2 $125,000 Year 3 $ 105,000 Working capital is required to be in place at the start of wach year equal to 10% of the cash inflow for that year. The cost of capital is 10%.
What is the present value of the working capital? How do you go about answering it?
Please ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum and not as a comment on a test.
However, have you not watched the free lectures? I work through a very similar example in the lecture on relevant cash flows for investment appraisal, explaining how to answer it!
The first receipt is in 3 years time, the second is in 4 years time, and so on. If you carry on counting (use your fingers) you will find the 7th receipt is in 9 years time.
I do not quite understand Q4 – could you please explain why the statement ‘There is only ever one IRR’ is not correct? And also the statement about a graph with NPV on “Y” and interest rate on “X” – wouldn’t it have a negative slope?
For a conventional set of cash flows (i.e. an outflow followed by a series of inflows) then there will be only one IRR and there will be a negative slope. However, if there is more than one change of sign (e.g. outflow followed by inflows followed by outflow) then there can be more than one IRR and the graph will be a curve with an upward and a downward slope. This is one of the standard possible problems with using IRR and I do explain it in the free lecture.
The NPV at 20% is -0.266. I haven’t converted anything.
(It is actually of course -266,000, and the NPV at 15% is actually +343,000, but using those figures will obviously give exactly the same answer with more messaging around)
Have you watched my free lectures on this? (Because there is no point in attempting the tests if you have not watched the lectures!)
If you have watched the lectures then you will know that the 10 year annuity factor is the total of the discount factors for years 1 to 10.
If we subtract the 2 year annuity factor (which is the total of the discount factors for years 1 to 2), the we are left with the total of the factors for years 3 to 10, which is what we want 🙂 )
The discount factor for a perpetuity is 1/r (which in this case is 1/0.11). However this gives the present value when the first receipt is in 1 years time – so 1 to infinity.
In this question the first receipt is immediate – time 0 – and then we get receipts for 1 to infinity. The PV of a receipt at time 0 is the amount of the receipt, and so to get the total PV we need to add this on.
Question 3 IRR 20% I calculated (2400*0.833) + (3100*0.694) + (2100*0.579) + (1800*0.482) = 6234 Less 6500 = 266 Please let me know where I went wrong.
For question 3, i keep getting 0.343 for the 15% discount factor? Also why is 0.307 and 0.2659 added together to get the IRR, isn’t 0.2659 a minus number?
Because discounting the perpetuity gives the PV when the first flow is in one years time. In this question the first flow is immediate, and the PV of 12,000 receivable immediately is 12,000.
For Q5, currently to work out the DF for a 9 year annuity i am using the tables and adding each year e.g. for 10% 0.909 + 0.826 + 0.751 + …+ 0.424 = 5.758. However I’m finding this quite time consuming and there is the chance to enter a number incorrectly.
I was just wondering is there a formula that you can you to quickly work out the DF?
Why don’t you just use the annuity tables that are provided in the exam? Those tables do it for you!!
I do suggest that you watch our free lectures on this (and the relevant F2 lectures as well if needed, because the discounting itself is all revision of Paper F2).
In Question 5 Why is it that the cash inflow period is 3-9 years and not 3-10 years? Is it not the first receivable in 3 years and then add 7 years you get 10. I have the same doubt in the lecture as well
There are 7 years of flows in total and the first is in 3 years time. So the second is in 4 years time, the third is in 5 years time, and so on. If you carry on counting then you will find that the last of the 7 years of flows is in 9 years time 🙂
If there are any where you do not understand the answer then do ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum 🙂 (and I do assume you are watching our free lectures – they are a complete course for Paper F9)
annmary1 says
Hi sir, could you please help me solve this question?
(a)If a project involved the outlay of $1000 today and provided a definite return of $1001, for the foreseeable future, would you accept it if you could get a return of 5% on investments of similar risk?
(b) What if the project gave a return of $1001 per year for a foreseeable future, starting in 3 years time?
John Moffat says
Ask this sort of question in the Ask the Tutor Forum – not as a comment on a test.
hameedy says
thanks
maiharmo says
Tichtop Ltd is considering investing $80 million in equipment which
will generate a net cash flow of $32 million per year for four years.
The company is able to depreciate the equipment at rate of 20% per
year on a straight line basis for tax purposes. The market value of
the equipment at the end of four years is expected to be $30 million.
The difference between the market value and the equipment’s tax value
is subject to tax. The corporate tax rate is 28% and the company’s
cost of capital is 14%.
Calculate:
(a) the project’s NPV
(b) the project’s IRR
(c )the project’s MIRR
( d ) the project’ pay back
this is my due assignment and i have no clue on how to write it please help
sieness says
this is a p4 question?? MIRR only available in p4 as i know
John Moffat says
Sieness is correct – MIRR is not examined in Paper FM.
Also, we do not do assignments for people. If you are taking AFM The new name for Paper P4) and do not understand what is mean by MIRR then watch my free AFM lectures and ask in the AFM Ask the Tutor Forum if anything is not clear (but don’t expect me to do you homework for you!!!)
rishabbohra98 says
I do not quite understand Q4 – could you please explain why the statement about a graph with NPV on “Y” and interest rate on “X” – wouldn’t it have a negative slope?
John Moffat says
If it is an outflow followed by inflows, then yes – it would have a negative slope. But if, for example, it was an inflow followed by outflows, then it would have a positive slope 🙂
ngodo says
Hello, could you please help me with this investment appraisal -allowing for tax and inflation. If a question reads ( A project has the following projected cash inflows
Year 1 $100,000
Year 2 $125,000
Year 3 $ 105,000
Working capital is required to be in place at the start of wach year equal to 10% of the cash inflow for that year. The cost of capital is 10%.
What is the present value of the working capital?
How do you go about answering it?
John Moffat says
Please ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum and not as a comment on a test.
However, have you not watched the free lectures? I work through a very similar example in the lecture on relevant cash flows for investment appraisal, explaining how to answer it!
rasiksharma says
In question 5,
thereafter each for 7 years should mean upto 10 years isn’t it. i.e 3 + 7 =10
John Moffat says
No.
The first receipt is in 3 years time, the second is in 4 years time, and so on.
If you carry on counting (use your fingers) you will find the 7th receipt is in 9 years time.
dzascik says
Dear John,
I do not quite understand Q4 – could you please explain why the statement ‘There is only ever one IRR’ is not correct?
And also the statement about a graph with NPV on “Y” and interest rate on “X” – wouldn’t it have a negative slope?
Thank you!
John Moffat says
For a conventional set of cash flows (i.e. an outflow followed by a series of inflows) then there will be only one IRR and there will be a negative slope.
However, if there is more than one change of sign (e.g. outflow followed by inflows followed by outflow) then there can be more than one IRR and the graph will be a curve with an upward and a downward slope.
This is one of the standard possible problems with using IRR and I do explain it in the free lecture.
dzascik says
Thank you! Now I get it 🙂
John Moffat says
That’s good 🙂
mittalkaran67 says
sir,
in question 3 how do you converted 266 in 0.266?
John Moffat says
I don’t know what you mean.
The NPV at 20% is -0.266. I haven’t converted anything.
(It is actually of course -266,000, and the NPV at 15% is actually +343,000, but using those figures will obviously give exactly the same answer with more messaging around)
Helen says
Please sir, can you explain question 5
John Moffat says
Have you watched my free lectures on this? (Because there is no point in attempting the tests if you have not watched the lectures!)
If you have watched the lectures then you will know that the 10 year annuity factor is the total of the discount factors for years 1 to 10.
If we subtract the 2 year annuity factor (which is the total of the discount factors for years 1 to 2), the we are left with the total of the factors for years 3 to 10, which is what we want 🙂 )
syntyche97 says
i still don’t get question 1.
could you please explain it again?
John Moffat says
The discount factor for a perpetuity is 1/r (which in this case is 1/0.11).
However this gives the present value when the first receipt is in 1 years time – so 1 to infinity.
In this question the first receipt is immediate – time 0 – and then we get receipts for 1 to infinity.
The PV of a receipt at time 0 is the amount of the receipt, and so to get the total PV we need to add this on.
jacinta says
Thank you so much.
dolatokun says
Question 3
IRR 20%
I calculated (2400*0.833) + (3100*0.694) + (2100*0.579) + (1800*0.482) = 6234
Less 6500 = 266
Please let me know where I went wrong.
John Moffat says
6234 – 6500 = (266), which is the same as in the ‘pop-up’ answer.
dolatokun says
Thank you for all youtr help John
John Moffat says
You are welcome 🙂
hlipschutz says
For question 3, i keep getting 0.343 for the 15% discount factor?
Also why is 0.307 and 0.2659 added together to get the IRR, isn’t 0.2659 a minus number?
John Moffat says
The NPV is 0.343. It is an error and I will have it corrected.
As far as adding the two NPV’s together, the difference between + .307 and – .2659 is the two added together.
The correct answer is IRR = 15% + (0.343 / (0.343 + 0.2659) x 5% = 17.8%
hlipschutz says
Thank you so much!
John Moffat says
Thank you for spotting the error 🙂
Achilleas says
Q1: Can you please explain why you add 12,000 to 109,100 (1/0.11*12,000)? Thanks
John Moffat says
Because discounting the perpetuity gives the PV when the first flow is in one years time.
In this question the first flow is immediate, and the PV of 12,000 receivable immediately is 12,000.
achmast says
Thanks a lot John
John Moffat says
You are welcome 🙂
stan15 says
Q2: I got $109,100.
Why should we add the $ 12,000 to the $ 109,100. Please help.
Q3: How do you get +0.307 for NPV 15%? I got +0.343 {(-6.5) +2.088+2.3436+1.3818+1.0296}
John says
For Q5, currently to work out the DF for a 9 year annuity i am using the tables and adding each year e.g. for 10% 0.909 + 0.826 + 0.751 + …+ 0.424 = 5.758. However I’m finding this quite time consuming and there is the chance to enter a number incorrectly.
I was just wondering is there a formula that you can you to quickly work out the DF?
John Moffat says
Why don’t you just use the annuity tables that are provided in the exam? Those tables do it for you!!
I do suggest that you watch our free lectures on this (and the relevant F2 lectures as well if needed, because the discounting itself is all revision of Paper F2).
John says
Thanks, its all come back now
John Moffat says
You are welcome 🙂
Myra says
For the third question, how is the npv at 15% and 20% calculated? I’m just not coming up with the answers.
Vineeth says
In Question 5 Why is it that the cash inflow period is 3-9 years and not 3-10 years? Is it not the first receivable in 3 years and then add 7 years you get 10.
I have the same doubt in the lecture as well
John Moffat says
There are 7 years of flows in total and the first is in 3 years time. So the second is in 4 years time, the third is in 5 years time, and so on. If you carry on counting then you will find that the last of the 7 years of flows is in 9 years time 🙂
Vineeth says
Oh alright. Thank you 🙂
John Moffat says
You are welcome 🙂
vjm6789 says
Sir, why are we taking DCF for 2 years time rather than 3 to subtract from the cumulative DCF for 9 years? Thank you in advance.
Sayem says
Wow, its a great practice for me but I always stuck on Theory based mcq’s Sir Moffat.
John Moffat says
If there are any where you do not understand the answer then do ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum 🙂
(and I do assume you are watching our free lectures – they are a complete course for Paper F9)