• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FM:
  • FM Notes
  • FM Lectures
  • FM Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • Revision Mock Exam
  • FM Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

FM Chapter 17 Questions – The cost of capital

VIVA

 

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. nalediroy says

    February 6, 2021 at 11:51 am

    Thank you so much for your brilliant lecture Mr John.I failed(44%) FM December 2020.I have a question which i was suppose to calculate Wacc.There were saying the share price grows at 5% for 5 years in perpetuity,the question was on convertible debts.I would like to know if i was suppose to use that 5% growth as growth for calculating cost of Equity too,because i only used the 5% for redeemption purpose only in the exam.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      February 6, 2021 at 12:06 pm

      The only relevant of the growth in the share price when calculating the cost of debt is to decide whether on redemption they will be taking cash or taking shares (worth whatever their expected value is after inflating at 5% per annum). Obviously they will be expected to choose whichever is the higher and then cost of debt will then be calculated on that basis.

      Log in to Reply
      • nalediroy says

        February 7, 2021 at 8:09 pm

        Thank you so much Mr. John, I now understand clearly. God bless you .

      • John Moffat says

        February 8, 2021 at 9:08 am

        You are welcome 🙂

  2. eceesay says

    June 22, 2020 at 7:14 am

    Hi John,
    I am a little bit confuse as to when to use post tax and pre tax when calculating the cost of debt. I did watch your free lectures about a thousand and one times but to avail.

    COULD YOU PLEASE HELP IN THIS INSTANCE BY EXPLAINING IT TO ME. Looking forward to your swift response.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      June 22, 2020 at 8:54 am

      The cost of debt is always calculated post tax. It is the return to investors that is pre-tax.

      Log in to Reply
      • eceesay says

        July 2, 2020 at 5:29 pm

        Hi John,

        Am so grateful thanks.

      • John Moffat says

        July 2, 2020 at 6:45 pm

        You are welcome 🙂

  3. sushanth12 says

    January 10, 2020 at 4:04 am

    80percent

    Log in to Reply
  4. draganel says

    November 29, 2019 at 3:46 pm

    Hi, I’m confused in Q5, we have 200,000 in issue by nominal 0.5 c, why in responses is multiplied 200,000 by 2.40. I think should be 200,000/0.5*2.40. Am I write? Can you help me please here?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 29, 2019 at 7:33 pm

      No you are not right.

      The question says that there are 200,000 shares. (You would only have been right if the question had said that the nominal (balance sheet value) of the shares was $200,000)

      Log in to Reply
      • draganel says

        November 29, 2019 at 8:10 pm

        Oooo thank’s a lot, it is tricky, and i should be more attentive

      • John Moffat says

        November 30, 2019 at 9:00 am

        You are welcome 🙂

  5. ijastb27 says

    November 22, 2019 at 5:30 am

    why is IRR calculated for q3 ?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 22, 2019 at 7:38 am

      Because that is how we always calculate the cost of redeemable or convertible debt!

      Have you not watched the free lectures on this?

      Log in to Reply
  6. Cherry-lee says

    October 25, 2019 at 11:56 am

    Sir with regards to question 2 chp 17, i dont understand how u got the cube root to b 5. I am getting an answer of 5.5.If i were to round it up it would have been ‘6’.Please explain .

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      October 25, 2019 at 2:25 pm

      You must be doing something wrong on your calculator. The cube root of 36.0/31.1 is 1.04998. Therefore g is indeed 5%.

      Log in to Reply
  7. natty2 says

    October 29, 2018 at 8:10 pm

    hi john for q 3 i don’t understand why choice 90pc for mv

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      October 30, 2018 at 7:52 am

      The first sentence of the question says that the market value is 90.

      Did you watch my free lectures on this before attempting the test?

      Log in to Reply
  8. natty2 says

    October 29, 2018 at 7:34 pm

    hi john for q 2 how do you get 5% for growth 36/31.1is 1.157556 gi am trying to find the cube but not finding it

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      October 30, 2018 at 7:51 am

      You do need to have a scientific calculator, and it will have a cube root button.

      Log in to Reply
      • natty2 says

        November 14, 2018 at 11:09 am

        sir thank you i get it was so worried i would not get it

      • John Moffat says

        November 14, 2018 at 5:44 pm

        You are welcome 🙂

  9. mayola says

    November 26, 2017 at 3:41 pm

    dear sir, in question no. 1 why the answer is not 8% they have told in one years time know sir? so the formula will be
    D1/Po+G

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 27, 2017 at 7:11 am

      33.6/420 + 0.05 equals 13%, not 8% !!

      Log in to Reply
      • mayola says

        November 30, 2017 at 2:59 pm

        ohh thank u so much

      • John Moffat says

        December 1, 2017 at 7:30 am

        You are welcome 🙂

  10. coralienana says

    November 11, 2017 at 10:58 am

    I have a question regarding Quizz question 5. When you compute the MV of debt, you do 200.000 * 90/100 = 180.000$. But but shouldn’t it be multiplied by 100 ? Because the market value of debt is as said 90p.c which is 90%*100 = 90 instead of 0,9.

    Therefore, i get a WACC of 7,20% which is not within the answers proposed… It get me confused.

    Thanks in advance,

    Kr

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 12, 2017 at 9:54 am

      The market value is $90 for every $100 nominal.
      Therefore $200 nominal is worth $180; $300 nominal is worth $240, and so on.

      $200,000 nominal is worth 200,000 x 90/100 = $180,000.

      Think about it, if the value of $100 nominal is only $90, how on earth can the value of $200,000 nominal be more than $200,000!!!

      Log in to Reply
  11. rinta says

    August 24, 2017 at 3:43 pm

    In question why the share price is taken as 420 instead of 4.20….?

    Log in to Reply
    • rinta says

      August 24, 2017 at 3:45 pm

      In question.1) why the share price is taken as 420 intead of 4.20?

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        August 24, 2017 at 4:08 pm

        It doesn’t matter whether you put the share price and the dividend both in $’s (so $4.20 and $0.32) or both in cents (so 420 and 32) – the answer is the same.

        (Did you actually watch my free lectures before attempting the test? The lectures are a complete free course for Paper F9 and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.)

  12. fola94 says

    August 6, 2017 at 2:24 pm

    I would appreciate it if I could get a detailed explanation for Question 3. I do not seem to understand how the NPV figures were arrived at. Thank you so much John.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      August 6, 2017 at 4:46 pm

      The correct figures are:

      At 10%, the NPV = – 90 + (7 x 3.791) + (110 x 0.621) = 4.85
      At 15%, the NPV = -90 + (7 x 3.352) + (110 x 0.497) = -11.87

      The IRR = 10 + (4.85 / (4.85 + 11.87)) x 5 = 11.45%

      Log in to Reply
  13. fola94 says

    August 6, 2017 at 2:14 pm

    Please, has question 3 been corrected?

    I do not seem to understand as to how you arrived at the NPVs listed in the correction that comes up after selecting the wrong answer.

    I got:

    d.f. PV@10% d.f. PV@5%
    0 MV (90) 1 (90) 1 (90)
    1-5 Int 7 3.791 26.54 4.329 30.30
    5 Red 110 0.521 57.31 0.784 86.24
    NPV= -6.15 NPV= 26.54

    Log in to Reply
  14. for8verlik says

    December 2, 2016 at 3:08 am

    Question one why not 8percent?
    By rearranging the formula
    I got
    re = D(1+g)/(P-g)

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      December 2, 2016 at 7:34 am

      You have rearranged the formula wrongly.

      If you watch my free lecture, you will see that rearranging the formula gives:

      Re = (Do(1+g) / P ) + g

      I do suggest you watch the lecture because this is an incredibly common question in the exam!!

      Log in to Reply
  15. nikkyrykiel says

    November 28, 2016 at 10:11 am

    Dear John,

    Thank you for organizing those quizes. They helped a lot
    I was able to significantly improve my knowledges and restore everything I knew before in a short time.

    <3 <3 <3

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 28, 2016 at 2:08 pm

      I am pleased they have helped you 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  16. ifeoluwapo says

    August 30, 2016 at 4:03 pm

    Please I would like to know the formula used to arrive @ the cost of equity for question 1

    Log in to Reply
  17. Amit says

    December 25, 2015 at 3:57 am

    Question 3
    IRR of the flows:
    0 M.V. (90)
    1-5 Int. 7 per annum (because tax allowable)
    5 Repayment 110
    In your calculation debt interest is not tax adjusted; i am confused sir. Pls kindly explain.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      December 25, 2015 at 9:01 am

      Sorry – you are correct and it is a mistake.

      I will have it corrected – thank you for pointing it out.

      Log in to Reply
  18. loong says

    December 8, 2015 at 7:02 am

    question 3 of 5 CHAPTER 17 PRACTISE QUESTIONS

    The NPV that i get by using discount factor 10% was 16.22 but not 6.22.

    therefore the final answer I get 15.1%

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      December 8, 2015 at 7:39 am

      You are correct – the NPV at 10% is 16.22.

      However that gives the correct IRR as 14.50%.

      Thanks for spotting the error – I will have it corrected.

      Log in to Reply
  19. artid1 says

    November 29, 2015 at 7:55 pm

    question 2 of 5 CHAPTER 17 PRACTISE QUESTIONS

    Please can you explain why the cost of equity is 12%? how is the calculation done?

    thank you

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 29, 2015 at 8:06 pm

      g = (cubed root of 36.0/31.1) – 1 = 0.05 or 5%

      Cost of equity = ((36.0 x 1.05) / 540) + 0.05 = 0.12 or 12%

      (I am currently entering workings so that when you submit an answer, the software will show the working for the correct answer. So far this is happening for the first 10 tests, but it will happen for all the tests within a few more days 🙂 )

      Log in to Reply
      • chandni says

        May 31, 2017 at 8:55 am

        Dear Sir,

        I would like to know why 540 is being used instead of 5.40.

      • John Moffat says

        May 31, 2017 at 9:29 am

        Because I have shown all the workings in cents!!!

        By all means show them in dollars (dividend = 0.36, MV = $5.40) and you will get exactly the same answer!!!!

  20. John Moffat says

    November 23, 2015 at 5:59 pm

    The question says that there are 200,000 shares (not 400,000). (It does not say that the nominal value is $200,000)

    Therefore the total market value of the equity is 200,000 x 2.40 = $480,000

    The market value of the debt is $180,000.

    Therefore the WACC = (480,000/(480,000+180,000)) x 15%) + ((180,000/(480,000 + 180,000)) x 7%) = 12.82%

    Log in to Reply
    • chenweijosh says

      November 24, 2015 at 12:55 pm

      Hi John

      Thank you for explaining!

      Such is a careless mistake of mine.

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        November 24, 2015 at 3:18 pm

        You are welcome 🙂

    • swweex says

      November 11, 2017 at 3:09 pm

      I just read the exact same thing for this. I saw it as $200,000 worth of shares not just 200,000 shares. Which I do all the time, I don’t read the question properly!! At least I know what I’m doing wrong 🙂

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        November 12, 2017 at 9:51 am

        The more you make mistakes, then less chance that you will make them in the exam 🙂

Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in