OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
ACCA News: June 2021 Remote session CBEs – booking window opens on 19 April
ACCA cancels centre-based exams in some locations and offers remote exams as an alternative. Read more >>
Sign up with YouTube premium to watch our lectures Ad-free and download them to watch offline.
Specially for OpenTuition students
February 7, 2021 at 10:45 am
Thankyou very much for your High Quality A* lecture series.
John Moffat says
February 7, 2021 at 3:04 pm
Thank you for your comment 🙂
January 14, 2021 at 2:24 am
Sir, if Parent sold to sub, we deduct the amount of 2000 from cost of sales and do we also deduct 2000 from the 54,700 (the profit attributable to parent) ?
October 3, 2020 at 7:46 am
Sir please when finding the profit attributable to the non-controlling interest, do we always have to subtract PURP from the profit of the *subsidiary if it was the one receiving the goods. I am asking this because in the acca specimen exam, they didn’t do that. It was just 80(400*20%)
October 3, 2020 at 7:49 am
The PURP is subtracted from the profit of the company that sold the goods to the other company – not the company that received them.
October 3, 2020 at 8:20 am
Okay now i understand that you only deduct the PURP from the profit of the subsidiary if it is the one selling the goods so if the Parent is the one selling the goods, would you subtract PURP from the balancing figure of the shareholders of P?
February 25, 2020 at 11:37 pm
SIR does we have to account for “dividends income from S” and loan notes adjustments in consolidated SOFP & SOPL, for this paper (FA)?
November 20, 2019 at 6:05 pm
Hi sir.. what’s the logic behind reducing the gross profit by increasing the cost of sales by 2,000 instead of decreasing revenue by 2,000? Thanks!
March 23, 2019 at 5:30 am
One would have taught since S sold 3 /4 th of the goods, which is ¾ x 28000 (21000). Then what should be removed from the revenue should have been the unsold goods of 7000 while cost of sales should be reduced by (7000 – 2000:purp ) = 5000. E.g.
Revenue (120000 + 110000 – 7000) 223,000
Cost of sales (55000 + 50000 – 7000 + 2000) 100,000
Gross profit 123,000
Though the same gross profit but if the question is what is the consolidated revenue and cost of sales, these would differ.
March 23, 2019 at 10:04 am
The revenue and cost of sales are both reduced by the full amount of the intergroup sales (not just those left in inventory). They should both only show the purchases and sales from outside the group.
This is all explained in the free lectures.
December 18, 2018 at 11:11 am
Sir, if we deduct the 28,000 from both Revenue and COGS, why is it necessary to create a PURP if those transactions (and therefore the accompanying profit) are not accounted for ?
December 18, 2018 at 2:57 pm
Because the 28,000 is the selling price from one company to the other, and not the original cost. Therefore the profits of the selling company include profit on the whole of the 28,000. Given that not all of those sales were sold outside the group, the PURP needs removing from the profit.
December 19, 2018 at 1:57 pm
Sir, if we remove the entire amount of intra-entity sales are we not thereby also removing any accompanying profit by definition (profit being broadly revenue minus COGS and expenses)? Is that entire transaction not removed from the records for the Consolidated SoPL?
December 19, 2018 at 2:26 pm
No – we are not removing the accompanying profit at all!
Removing the 28,000 from group purchases and group sales does not affect the total group profit at all. Doing that is just making sure we only show the total purchases and sales externally.
The 28,000 is included in the sales of the company that sold the goods. That company is recording a profit on all of their sales. If some of the goods did not end up being sold externally, then the group cannot include all of that profit.
Therefore the profit of the group must be reduced by the PURP (and we achieve that by adding it to the group’s cost of sales).
September 22, 2018 at 8:46 am
The 28000 is deducted from Revenue and COGS whether or not the buyer has sold all of it?
September 22, 2018 at 3:13 pm
Yes, all is deducted because they were not sales or purchases to/from outside the group.
August 11, 2018 at 10:37 am
sir why cost of sale deduct by 28000 not at 20000?
August 11, 2018 at 2:24 pm
S sold goods to P for $28,000. Therefore the cost to P was $28,000, and P will there have included $28,000 in cost of sales in their own accounts.
August 7, 2018 at 9:07 am
But what if the parent sell the goods to subsidiary?
August 7, 2018 at 11:25 am
As I say in the previous lectures – you subtract the PURP from the retained earnings of the company that sold the goods to the other company.
June 25, 2019 at 7:55 pm
So in the case where parent sells goods to subsidiary, in SOPL, we will reduce profits of P by PURP, same like in the lecture you’re reducing the Non controlling interest?
So if the question was other way around it would be:
P: (70000-16200) – 2000
NCI: 45% x 36000 = 16200
Total profit: 70000
June 25, 2019 at 8:29 pm
And with that it will also change the movement on retained earning, where profit for the year will also be reduced by PURP?
You must be logged in to post a comment.