• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FM:
  • FM Notes
  • FM Lectures
  • FM Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • Revision Mock Exam
  • FM Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

FM Chapter 9 Questions – Discounted cash flow – further aspects

VIVA

 

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AvatarNaveenMatt says

    November 27, 2025 at 11:35 pm

    Question 2’s answer says “the discount factor for year 1 – 4 at 10%…”.
    It should say the “annuity factor”. Just mentioning because someone else in the comments got confused and was asking when to use AF or DF.

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      November 28, 2025 at 12:18 pm

      OK, although the fact that the answer does not use the term annuity factor the fact that is says 1 to 4 does imply that is the annuity factor 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  2. Avatarkay123 says

    November 19, 2025 at 7:49 pm

    the last question should it be 8000*.60=4000+4000*.50 =2000 total Npv 6000?

    Log in to Reply
    • Avatarkay123 says

      November 19, 2025 at 8:08 pm

      When I watch over the lecture maximum should be 6800

      Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      November 20, 2025 at 9:43 am

      8000 x 0.6 = 4800 (not 4000)

      Log in to Reply
  3. Avatarkay123 says

    November 19, 2025 at 7:40 pm

    Can you explain why the $10,000 was not taking out in the first year? and subtracted from 3600?

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      November 20, 2025 at 9:44 am

      I have no idea which question you are referring to.

      Log in to Reply
      • Avatarkay123 says

        November 20, 2025 at 3:14 pm

        question 4

    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      November 20, 2025 at 7:08 pm

      The question says that they are replacing every two years and so the scrap value after one year is of no relevance. Have you watched my free lectures on the replacement decision?

      Log in to Reply
  4. Avatarragnar7 says

    October 21, 2019 at 4:14 pm

    Hi John,

    For the last question, isn’t it better to not do project A at all and do project B 1 and a half times? That would give an NPV of $7200. Or in the exam, can you not do the same project multiple times?

    Thanks

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      October 21, 2019 at 6:12 pm

      As I do state in my free lectures, infinitely divisible means that you can do fractions of projects but you cannot do more than 100% of a project (so you cannot do it multiple times) 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  5. AvatarAyesha says

    September 19, 2018 at 4:33 am

    hi John, I do not understand solution of Question 2. Why we did not use Annuity Factor 3.791 for 5 Years at 10%?

    Thanks
    A

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      September 19, 2018 at 6:52 am

      Because the first flow was at the start of the year. So the flows are from time 0 to time 4.
      The 5 year annuity factor would only be relevant if the flows were from time 1 to time 5.

      Log in to Reply
  6. AvatarSun says

    August 17, 2018 at 10:33 pm

    Hi Sir,

    Q1: What’s the error for and how to correct “Tax Allowance Depreciation is a relevant cash flow when evaluating borrowing to buy compared to leasing as a finance choice?

    What’s the error for and how to correct “Asset replacement decisions require relevant cash flows to be discounted by the after-tax cost of debt”
    Thanks in advance.

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      August 18, 2018 at 10:03 am

      The answer to both your questions appears when you have submitted your own answers!

      Depreciation is never a cash flow – it is used to calculate the tax, but is not a cash flow.

      Investment decisions are discounted at the WACC, not just at the cost of debt.

      Did you watch the free lectures before attempting this test?

      Log in to Reply
  7. Avatarrezaul1 says

    March 6, 2018 at 12:55 pm

    Dear John,

    silly question – how do you know when to use discount rate / when to use annuity table

    please explain sir

    Thanks
    Rez

    Log in to Reply
    • Avatarrezaul1 says

      March 6, 2018 at 12:57 pm

      referring to Question 4

      Log in to Reply
      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        March 6, 2018 at 1:07 pm

        When calculating the PV of one replacement you need to use the present value tables.
        When then calculating the EAC, you divide by the annuity factor.

        I explain the rules and the reasons in my free lectures on replacement, and I do suggest that you watch them – I cannot type out all my lectures here!

        The lectures are a complete free course for Paper F9 and cover everything needed to pass the exam well.

      • Avatarrezaul1 says

        March 6, 2018 at 1:20 pm

        Thank you so much for such a speedy response sir.

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        March 6, 2018 at 3:37 pm

        You are welcome 🙂

  8. Avatarvirtualstudent says

    February 8, 2018 at 5:29 am

    Hi,
    In my test Q# is 1 and it has four option to choose correct one, my inquiry is on one of the option which says asset replacement decision require cash flow to be discounted by after tax cost of debt, this is true what I knew but answer says no, it should be discounted with weighted average cost of capital, I am wondering I did not see any use of weighted average cost of capital in investment appraisal chapters. Asset replacement require calculation of optimum replacement cycle which require post tax cost of capital, could you please elaborate answer why to choose WACC and how to find that at this stage of FM course.
    Thanks

    Log in to Reply
  9. Avatarfola94 says

    July 18, 2017 at 4:31 am

    Question 4:

    From my calculations, the total PV = (36,000) + (3,600) + 800 = (38,800)

    How did you therefore get a figure of $38,612?

    Thank you.

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      July 18, 2017 at 7:50 am

      I discounted the flows at 10% (PV means present value)!

      I do suggest that you watch the free lectures on this.

      Log in to Reply
      • Avatarfola94 says

        July 21, 2017 at 6:59 am

        Alright, thank you.

  10. Avatarobinam says

    September 5, 2016 at 3:37 pm

    Why didnt we consider the 1st yeat scrap value

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      September 5, 2016 at 4:01 pm

      I assume you are asking about Question 4? (Please say which question in future).

      Since the question says we are replacing every 2 years, it is only the scrap value at the end of 2 years that is relevant. (We are not scrapping at the end of the first year!!)

      Have you watched my free lectures on replacement? If not, then I do suggest that you do.

      Log in to Reply
      • Avatarpoezarphyu says

        March 3, 2017 at 7:04 am

        Dear John,
        In question no-4,
        When calculating Equivalent Annual Cost,I m confusing whether i should divided by 1.736 (2 year annuity figure) or 2.736(which is 1 for year 0 + 1.736 for 2 year annuity figure).Please clarify for me.Thanks in advance.

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        March 3, 2017 at 9:50 am

        You divide by the 2 year annuity factor (1.736) – this is all explained in my free lectures on replacement 🙂

      • Avatarpoezarphyu says

        March 4, 2017 at 2:45 am

        Thank you sir 🙂

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        March 4, 2017 at 9:46 am

        You are welcome 🙂

  11. Avatargonko says

    November 26, 2015 at 9:18 pm

    A lease agreement has an NPV of 32000 at a rate of 10%. Lease has 5 equal payments payable at the start of each year.

    So Y0 payments begin. So time 1-4 in perpetuity. 32000/3.170 to find the annual payment amount 10095?

    Log in to Reply
    • AvatarJohn Moffat says

      November 27, 2015 at 7:18 am

      The annual payment is 7,674

      If the payment is X per year, then the PV of the first payment at time 0 is X
      The PV of the remaining 4 payment (1 to 4) is 3.170X

      So the PV of all 5 payments = X + 3.170X = 4.170X = 32,000
      X = 32,000 / 4.170 = 7,674

      (Incidentally, 1 – 4 is an annuity, not a perpetuity. A perpetuity is every year for ever)

      Log in to Reply
      • Avatargonko says

        November 27, 2015 at 10:37 am

        Thank you. I got it now, and yes, I confused the term annuity with perpetuity….not enough coffee lol.

        Could I take the same approach for all questions like this. So say the annuity factor for T4 is 3.170, and just add 1.
        So annuity of N+1 . So Principle / N+1?

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        November 27, 2015 at 1:34 pm

        If the flows start at time 0, then yes.

        However the flows could start at any time.

      • Avatargonko says

        December 3, 2015 at 12:20 pm

        What would happen if the flows started at T1 instead of T0. I am guessing we do not add X onto the annuity factor.
        So instead of 3.170X becoming 4.170, it will just be a straight forward division using 3.170?

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        December 3, 2015 at 1:50 pm

        Yes – the annuity factors on their own assume that the first flow is in 1 years time.

      • Avatarwaqasiqbaal says

        December 1, 2019 at 5:49 pm

        Sir, this is an annuity then why are we dividing it instead of multiplying with 4.170? Please explain.

      • AvatarJohn Moffat says

        December 1, 2019 at 6:58 pm

        Multiplying the amount each year by the annuity factor gives the present value.

        Here we know the present value and so we divide by the annuity factor to get the amount each year.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in