OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
View ACCA F4 lectures Download F4 notes
Sign up with YouTube premium to watch our lectures Ad-free and download them to watch offline.
Specially for OpenTuition students
May 15, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Regarding the case of R v Oll (1994), how would the court know who to convict in the case of corporate manslaughter? (Especially in a large organisation where there are multiple in-charge)?
May 15, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Why do you think the Chief Executive is called the Chief Executive?
BELLO OLAIDE TITUS says
October 31, 2015 at 8:49 am
Is it in all forms of negligence on the part of an employee that he/she is liable? Or this is has to do with a manslaughter case only?
October 31, 2015 at 10:54 am
What has this got to do with Salomon v Salomon?
This looks like a question that should have been asked on Ask the Tutor
“Is it in all forms of negligence….” – Is WHAT in all forms of negligence?
When you tell me, tell me on the Ask the Tutor forum
November 13, 2013 at 1:17 am
Absolutely loved this lecture! Particularly the juicy bit about murder 😀 I laughed out loud on the Amreican fire bit. haha
May 9, 2013 at 11:29 pm
thank you mike
April 13, 2013 at 9:27 pm
@Mike little: Absolutely love your lectures!
December 7, 2012 at 12:20 am
Just out of curiousity in regards to murder, how would the prosecutor know when you originally had the idea of murdering someone , to know when ‘the year and a day’ has been surpassed? I mean all you have to do is lie to save your skin?!! Great exam tips though!
December 7, 2012 at 6:45 am
@cecel, Lie?!!! People don’t lie – that would be wrong! So, if you’re in Court on a murder charge and the judge asks you when you most recently thought of killing your victim, you would tell the truth and say “Just last week, your Honour”
December 7, 2012 at 2:55 pm
@MikeLittle, i have a weird question, we read so many case laws in f4, for example in contract law 2 people had a verbal acceptance.. how do they prove it? i mean one who is being sued will literally just say i did not accept any offer.. how do judges know those small facts without any evidence, im just so curious, any written proof makes sense but there are just so many cases in which the facts made me wonder why the accused accepted something which would lead him into paying the damages. i know its not relevant but i would like to know.
December 7, 2012 at 3:00 pm
@captmario, “On the balance of probabilities ….” I think the judges would likely ask themselves “Why on Earth would he do this if the contract he claims to exist didn’t exist?” For example, why WOULD you pay the mortgage on a house if your father hadn’t promised to transfer the house to you? ( Errington v Errington )
October 27, 2012 at 12:53 pm
sir can you write on the screen for us the cases wen u are quoting so that if i fail to hear you clearly i can read from your screen myself. Very interesting lecture sir thank you very much
October 27, 2012 at 2:14 pm
the tutor is using opentuition course notes – and you should use them too, when you are watching the lectures.
October 4, 2012 at 7:52 pm
Interesting cases, Now should I quote the same cases when I am here in South Africa!
October 5, 2012 at 11:20 am
@tauraiversatile, If you’re doing the English Law variant then, yes, these are the cases you should quote!
June 17, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Do we need to quote each of case in particular question? Or do we need to even quote a case in company law ? is it necessary?
June 2, 2011 at 1:46 am
are there any F4 GLOBAL lectures available on line? PLEEEEASE
and any exam tips for F4 GLOBAL as well?
May 16, 2011 at 9:14 pm
Humble request for F4 global variant lecture note
May 17, 2011 at 6:42 am
F4 Global notes are on line: https://opentuition.com/acca/f4/
You must be logged in to post a comment.