Learn or revise key terms and concepts for your ACCA Advanced Audit and Assurance (AAA) exam using OpenTuition interactive ACCA AAA Flashcards.
There are over 100 ACCA AAA flashcards available
Common controls are controls designed by group management that are intended to operate in a common manner across multiple entities or business units.
See chapter 21
A component auditor is a part of the engagement team for a group audit.
Is this statement true or false?
True
See chapter 21
What is a ‘component auditor’?
A component auditor is an auditor who performs audit work related to a component for purposes of the group audit
See chapter 21
What is the ‘applicable financial reporting framework’?
Applicable financial reporting framework – the financial reporting framework adopted by management in the preparation of the financial statements that is acceptable in view of the nature of the entity and the objective of the financial statements or that is required by law or regulation.
See chapter 14
What are the uses of performance information?
- Improvement – performance information helps identify wastage (for example).
- Monitoring – how well has the government department/agency performed against targets?
- Reporting – the department/agency is accountable to government and taxpayers (who provide funding) and the users of the service.
See chapter 31
What examples of measures of economy, efficiency and effectiveness be relevant to a health service responsible for hospitals?
- Economy – the cost of drugs for a specific medical condition.
- Efficiency – the number of patients attended to in a specific department (e.g. X-ray) per day.
- Effectiveness – readmission rates.
See chapter 31
What is a ‘performance audit’?
A performance audit is an independent examination of the efficiency and effectiveness of government undertakings, with due regard to economy, and the aim of leading to improvements.
See chapter 31
Why are the procedures undertaken in a due diligence assignment to gather information principally analytical procedures and inquiry?
Although other audit procedures may be conducted in an agreed-upon-procedures engagement, due diligence is essentially a review engagement. The principal procedures are inquiry and analytical procedures because as such assignments are comparably short, trend analysis, etc is more appropriate than external confirmations, physical inventory observation, etc. Also, the review is likely to include forecasts (PFI) which cannot be ‘audited’.
See chapter 30
What factors should be considered before accepting a due diligence engagement to report on a proposed acquisition by and audit client?
- Ethical considerations (e.g. fee for DD review create a self-interest threat for the audit).
- Scope of review engagement.
- Timescale and reporting deadline (and availability of staff).
See chapter 30
How does the scope of a due diligence (DD) assignment generally compare with an audit of financial statements?
The scope of a DD assignment is generally much wider that an audit of historical financial statements. An audit essentially concerns only the current year and comparatives. DD may include:
- Financial information for the last five years (say)
- Management accounts
- Profit and cash flow forecasts
- Business plans
See chapter 30
What evidence would you seek to verify the ‘number of serious accidents in the workplace’ included in your audit client’s sustainability report?
- Records held by human resources.
- Incident reports/accident log book.
- Serious criteria (as opposed to ‘minor’).
- Minutes of board meetings (discussing incidents).
- Claims made under an employer’s insurance liability policy.
- Correspondence with lawyers (e.g. legal claims by injured employees).
See chapter 29
What risks of misstatement in financial statements may arise from the effects of environmental matters?
- Provision may be required to cover, for example, environmental damage and costs of restoration (IAS 37).
- Decommissioning costs, for example, should be capitalised on initial recognition (IAS 16).
- In a business combination, contingent liabilities for environmental damage must be recognised as provisions (IFRS 3).
- Environmental damage may result in the impairment of assets (IAS 38).
See chapter 29
What is an ‘integrated report’?
An integrated report is a concise communication about how an organisation’s strategy, governance, performance and prospects, in the context of its external environment, lead to the creation of value over the short, medium and long term.
(This is assumed knowledge of Strategic Business Reporting.)
See chapter 29
What might the purposes of a fraud investigation by a forensic accountant?
A fraud investigation by a forensic accountant may be carried out:
- to quantify a possible claim under a fidelity policy
- to provide evidence for prosecution of the perpetrator(s)
(It may also enable steps to be taken to eliminate the system’s weaknesses which led to the fraud. However, if this was the main purpose it would most likely be carried out by internal audit, say, rather than a forensic accountant.)
See chapter 28
What are the main applications of forensic auditing?
The main applications of forensic auditing include:
- Fraud investigations (also money laundering)
- Insurance claims
- Negligence claims
- Other
- Contract disputes
- Matrimonial disputes
- Asset tracing
See chapter 28
What is a ‘forensic audit’?
A forensic audit is the process of gathering, analysing and reporting on data (an ‘audit’) for use in connection with courts of law (‘forensic’).
See chapter 28
What are the objectives of an examination to report on prospective financial information (PFI)?
To ensure that assumptions are:
- reasonable (and not obviously wrong or over-optimistic);
- suitable for intended use (i.e. consistent with purpose of information); and
- adequately disclosed.
The ensure that PFI has been properly prepared and presented:
- on the basis of the assumptions;
- consistent with historical financial statements;
- using appropriate accounting principles.
See chapter 27
What is the difference between a ‘statement of cash flows’ and a ‘cash flow forecast (or budget)’?
A statement of cash flows is a financial statement which is prepared and presented in a set of historical financial statements in accordance with IAS 7.
A cash flow forecast (or budget) may be prepared as an internal management tool (e.g. to assist in assessing going concern or evaluating a proposed capital investment) or to provide information to third parties (e.g. lenders).
See chapter 27
What level of assurance can be provided by an examination of prospective financial information?
The examination of prospective financial information is a limited assurance engagement and the report will include a statement of ‘negative’ assurance.
See chapter 27
In the context of prospective financial information, what is the difference between a ‘forecast’ and a ‘projection’, if any?
A forecast is based on assumptions about future events and management’s actions that are expected to happen (e.g. for the unexpired period of the current accounting period).
A projection is based future events and management actions which are not necessarily expected to take place (i.e. hypothetical/‘what-if’ assumptions).
See chapter 27
What types of engagement are described as related services?
Related services include:
– Engagements to perform agreed-upon procedures
– Compilation engagements
See chapter 26
What types of engagement may be described as review engagements?
Review engagements include:
- Engagements to review historical financial statements
- Review of interim financial statements
See chapter 26
What types of engagement may be described as an assurance engagement in accordance with the IESBA’s international framework?
Assurance engagements include:
- Audits of historical financial information
- Reviews of historical financial information
- Other assurance engagements
- Examination of prospective financial information
- Assurance reports on controls at a service organisation
- Assurance engagements to report on the compilation of pro forma financial information included in a prospectus
See chapter 26
During the year your client acquired a subsidiary that is material to the group. The component auditor has given an unmodified opinion on the subsidiary’s financial statements, which report a loss for the year. The group financial statements show only the investment at cost and management has refused to consolidate the subsidiary’s results.
How would this affect your audit opinion?
Non-consolidation of a material subsidiary would have a pervasive effect on the consolidated financial statements (since all the line items in the subsidiary’s financial statements should be consolidated 100%).
The audit opinion would be adverse – on the grounds of non-compliance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations.
See chapter 25
Shortly before the reporting date a fire in the accounts department destroyed many of the accounting records and management has been able to only partially reconstruct them.
How would this affect the auditor’s report?
The pervasive lack of sufficient appropriate evidence will give rise to a disclaimer of opinion. The basis for the disclaimer of the opinion will explain the scope limitation.
(Even if this were a listed client, it would not be reported as a key audit matter as the auditor cannot have audited the financial statements.)
See chapter 25
An auditor concludes that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate but material uncertainty exists as borrowing facilities are coming to an end and new arrangements have not yet been agreed. This is not disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
How would this affect the audit opinion, if at all?
The lack of disclosure gives risk to material misstatement. The audit opinion should therefore be qualified ‘except for’.
(If the matter had been adequately disclosed the auditor’s report would include a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section and the audit opinion would not be modified in this regard.)
See chapter 25
During the year your client migrated its principal financial reporting processes to a new IT system.
Where would this be reported in the auditor’s report, if at all?
If the client is a listed entity it would be a key audit matter. Due to inherent risk of error this would be of great significance to the audit and a matter communicated to those charged with governance. If the client is not a listed entity, it would not be reported.
See chapter 24
What is a key audit matter (KAM)?
KAMs are those matters which, in the auditor’s professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period. They are selected from matters communicated to those charged to governance.
Inclusion of KAMs in the auditor’s report is a requirement only for listed companies.
See chapter 23
What is an ‘other matter’ paragraph?
An ‘other matter’ paragraph draws the users’ attention to a matter which is relevant to their understanding of the audit, the auditor’s responsibilities or auditor’s report (rather than the financial statements).
See chapter 23
What is an ‘emphasis of matter’ paragraph?
An ‘emphasis of matter’ paragraph draws the users’ attention to a matter which, although appropriately presented or disclosed in the financial statements, is fundamental to their understanding of the financial statements.
See chapter 23
An auditor concludes that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate but material uncertainty exists. Where should this be reported in the auditor’s report?
A material uncertainty related to going concern should be reported in a separate section, suitably headed (e.g. ‘Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern’) of the auditor’s report.
See chapter 23
In which paragraph in the auditor’s report will the auditor reference to compliance with International Standards on Auditing?
Compliance with ISAs will be stated in the basis of opinion paragraph.
(The financial reporting framework (e.g. IFRS) will be identified in the opinion paragraph.)
See chapter 23
What are the four types of audit opinion?
- Unmodified opinion
- Qualified opinion
- Adverse opinion
- Disclaimer of opinion
See chapter 23
What is the auditor’s responsibility for subsequent events?
Before the date of the auditor’s report the auditor has a proactive duty to identify subsequent events.
After the date of the auditor’s report the auditor’s duty is only to respond to facts which become known. For example:
if the financial statements have not yet been issued, management can still amend them (and the auditor amend the auditor’s report) – this is rare as the auditor’s report will generally be signed immediately before their issue;
if the financial statements have been issued, they may be withdrawn and reissued (with a new auditor’s report) – this is exceptional.
See chapter 22
What is the difference between ‘events after the reporting period’ (IAS 10) and ‘subsequent events’ (ISA 560)?
Events after the reporting period are those that occur between the end of the reporting period and the date on which the financial statements are authorised for issue (IAS 10.
Subsequent events are:
events that occur between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report; and
facts that become known after the date of the auditor’s report.
See chapter 22
What is the difference between an adjusting event and a non-adjusting event?
Both adjusting and non-adjusting events are events after the reporting period (IAS 10). The difference is that adjusting events provide evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date whereas as non-adjusting events indicate conditions that arose after the reporting date.
See chapter 22
What is a ‘transnational audit’?
A transnational audit is an audit of financial statements which is, or may be, relied on outside the audited entity’s home jurisdiction for purposes of significant lending, investment or regulatory decisions.
See chapter 21
What is a ‘comfort letter’?
A comfort letter is a formal letter of support that confirms a parent’s intention to keep a subsidiary in operational existence.
See chapter 21
What audit considerations may arise when a group acquires a new subsidiary during the year?
Confirmation of date that control was obtained
Calculation of goodwill
Elimination of inter-company transactions
Agreement of inter-company balances (so that they can be eliminated)
Adjustments to apply uniform accounting policies
Adjustments for non-coterminous reporting dates
See chapter 21
How is goodwill calculated on initial acquisition of a subsidiary?
Goodwill on acquisition is calculated as:
Fair value of consideration
Plus: Value of non-controlling interest (if any)
Less: Fair value of net assets acquired
See chapter 21
What is component materiality and how does it compare with group materiality?
Component materiality is the materiality of a component as determined by the group auditor. It will be different for each component, lower than group materiality and not necessarily an arithmetical proportion of group materiality (i.e. their sum can be greater than group materiality).
See chapter 21
In the context of the audit of group financial statements, what is a component?
A component is an entity, business unit, function or business activity (or some combination thereof) determined by the group auditor for purposes of planning and performing audit procedures in a group audit.
See chapter 21
What disclosures in the financial statements do related party transactions require?
Disclosure required include:
- The related party relationship
- The types of transactions
- An indication of volume (amount or proportion)
- Pricing policies
- Amounts outstanding
- Terms of settlement
- Any allowances for irrecoverability
See chapter 20
What are the principal auditing issue arising from related party relationships?
The auditor must understand related party relationships to be able to:
recognise the increased risk of fraud; and
conclude on the fair presentation of related party transactions (in accordance with IAS 24) and compliance with legislation.
See chapter 20
What types of transactions that appear to be outside normal business terms may identify relate party transactions?
Sales/purchase transactions with abnormal terms of trade (e.g. inflated prices or large discounts).
Leasing premises or providing management services on below market terms.
Unrecorded transactions (e.g. services provided at no charge).
Transactions lacking a business reason for their occurrence.
See chapter 20
What is a related party transaction?
A related party transaction is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties, regardless of whether a price is charged.
See chapter 20
What written representation might be included in a representation letter relating to events after the reporting date?
That management is not aware of any material events occurring after the reporting date that may require adjust or disclosure other than those that have been adjusted or disclosed.
See chapter 19
Can a management representation alone ever provide sufficient audit evidence relating to a matter that is material to the financial statements?
No – if management representation is the only source of evidence it is insufficient.
See chapter 19
Why should the auditor obtain written representations?
The auditor should obtain written representations:
- To confirm management’s responsibilities relating to:
- The preparation of financial statements
- Information provided to the auditor and completeness of transactions recorded
- To support other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements.
See chapter 19
What is the difference between a Type 1 and Type 2 assurance report on the controls of a service organisation?
A Type 1 report concerns the design and implementation of the control systems. A Type 2 report concerns the operating effectiveness of the control system.
See chapter 18
What finance function activities may be outsourced?
- Receivables ledger management (factoring)
- Purchase ledger processing
- Tax planning and management
- Payroll processing
- Management accounting
- Internal audit
See chapter 18
What is ‘direct assistance’?
Direct assistance is the use of internal auditors to perform audit procedures under the direction, supervision and review of the external auditor.
See chapter 17
What factors should the external auditor consider when assessing whether to rely on the work of internal audit?
Criteria for assessing whether the external auditor should seek to reply on the work of internal audit are:
- Objectivity (e.g. strong organisational status)
- Competence (including adequate resources)
- A systematic and disciplined approach
(If any of these criteria are assessed as weak, the external auditor should not rely on the work of internal audit.)
See chapter 17
Who is an ‘auditor’s expert’?
Auditor’s expert is an individual (or organisation) possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing, whose work is used by the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
See chapter 16
Who is a ‘management’s expert’?
Management’s expert is an individual (or organisation) possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing, whose work assists management in preparing the financial statements.
See chapter 16
What is the purpose of test data?
Test data is data submitted for processing by the client’s computer system to test the operation of controls. If effective, the level of substantive procedures can then be reduced.
See chapter 15
What type of computer-assisted audit technique could be used in analytical procedures.
Audit programs (software) are mainly used for substantive procedures and can therefore be used for analytical procedures.
See chapter 15
When is a performance obligation satisfied over time in accordance with IFRS 15?
A performance obligation is satisfied over time if ONE of the following criteria is met:
- The customer receives and consumes the benefits of the goods or services while the contract is being fulfilled; or
- The performance creates or enhances an asset while it is controlled by the customer; or
- The performance does not create an asset which the supplier has an alternative use for and the supplier has the right to enforce payment for performance completed to date (e.g. a construction contract).
(A performance obligation that is not satisfied over time is satisfied at a point in time.)
See chapter 14
What audit evidence is necessary for the audit of a defined benefit scheme?
The audit of a defined benefit scheme will require an independent consulting actuary’s report.
See chapter 14
How should leases be treated in accordance with IFRS 16?
All leases except short-term leases (not more than 12 months) and leases of low-value assets (less than $5,000) must be capitalised as right-of-use assets in the statement of financial position (with a
corresponding lease liability).
See chapter 14
What is the ‘recoverable amount’ of an asset (or cash-generating unit).
Recoverable amount is the higher of:
Value in use
Fair value less costs of disposal
See chapter 14
Why must financial statements be adjusted for ‘adjusting events’ after the reporting date?
By definition, adjusting events provide evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date.
See chapter 14
What audit risks arise from the distinction between a provision and contingent liabilities?
A provision is a liability (i.e. an obligation) and must be recognised (i.e. in the statement of financial position). A contingent liability that is a possible (but not remote) obligation must be disclosed.
See chapter 14
What is ‘sufficient appropriate’ audit evidence?
Sufficient appropriate audit evidence is what is needed to support the auditor’s opinion and report. Sufficiency and appropriateness are interrelated – sufficiency is a measure of quantity and appropriateness is a measure of quality (relevance and reliability).
See chapter 13
What are the evidence gathering procedures identified in ISA 500 Audit Evidence?
Analytical procedures
Enquiry and Confirmation (a specific type of enquiry
Inspection (of records or documents or tangible assets)
Observation (of a process or procedure)
Recalculation (of mathematical accuracy) and Reperformance (independent execution of a procedure or control)
See chapter 13
What assertions are relevant to a liability?
assertions are the direct (explicit) and indirect representations that management makes about the transactions, balances and events that are embodied in the financial statements. For a liability, these assertions are:
- Existence
- Obligations
- Completeness
- Accuracy, valuation and allocation
- Classification
- Presentation
See chapter 13
What is cut-off?
Cut-off is the financial statement assertion that transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
See chapter 13
What is non-sampling risk and how can it be minimised?
Non-sampling risk is a component of detection risk and is the risk that arises for any reason not related to sample size.
Non-sampling risk can be minimised through, for example, adequate planning, assigning appropriate staff, the application of professional judgement, clear supervision and review of the work carried out.
See chapter 11
What are the components of audit risk and which of these components should the auditor manage?
- Inherent risk (IR) is the susceptibility (risk) of material misstatement assuming no related internal controls.
- Control risk (CR) is the risk that internal controls do not prevent or detect and correct misstatements.
- Detection risk (DR) is the risk that the auditor will not detect a misstatement.
- The auditor must manage DR to manage overall audit risk. (IR and CR are assessed.)
See chapter 11
What are the components of business risk?
Business risk is the risk that an entity is unable to achieve one or more of its strategic objectives. It includes strategic risk, operational risk, financial risk and compliance risk.
(Other classifications of business risk include reputation risk, environment risk, process risk and information risk.)
See chapter 11
What is performance materiality used for?
Performance materiality is used in designing and performing audit procedures and evaluating the aggregated of immaterial misstatements.
See chapter 10
What is performance materiality?
Performance materiality is a lower amount set by the auditor to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability (i.e. risk) that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements could exceed materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
See chapter 10
What is materiality?
Information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size of the item or error judged in the particular circumstances of its omission or misstatement.
It provides a threshold or cut-off point rather than being a primary qualitative characteristic which information must have if it is to be useful.
See chapter 10
What does an ‘Engagement Quality Review’ of any client involve?
- Discussion of significant matters with the engagement partner.
- Review of the financial statements and the proposed auditor’s report.
- Review of selected audit documentation relating to the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions it reached.
- Evaluation of the conclusions reached in formulating the auditor’s report and consideration of whether the proposed auditor’s report is appropriate.
See chapter 9
What are the EIGHT elements of a firm’s system of quality management according to ISQM 1?
- The firm’s risk assessment process
- Governance and leadership
- Relevant ethical requirements
- Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements
- Engagement performance
- Resources
- Information and communication
- Monitoring and remediation process
See chapter 9
What is a ‘system of quality management’?
A system of quality management to provide it with reasonable assurance that:
(1) The firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and
(2) Reports issued by the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the circumstances.
See chapter 9
What factors may determine whether a deficiency (or combination of deficiencies) in internal control is a significant deficiency?
The likelihood that it could lead to material misstatements.
The susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability.
The financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiency.
The volume of activity in the account balance or class of transactions exposed to the deficiency.
See chapter 8
What is a ‘significant deficiency in internal control’?
A significant deficiency in internal control is one that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to merit the attention of those charged with governance.
See chapter 8
What are the auditor’s responsibilities for the evaluation of misstatements identified during the audit?
To accumulate misstatements and communicate them to an appropriate level of management and request correction.
If there are uncorrected misstatements, to reassess materiality (and the overall audit strategy and audit plan).
To communicate the effect of uncorrected misstatements to those charged with governance.
To obtain written representation that the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial.
See chapter 8
What is a ‘misstatement’ in a financial statement.
A misstatement is any difference between how a transaction, balance or event has been treated in financial statements and how it should have been treated (e.g. in accordance with IFRS). Misstatement may arise from error or fraud.
See chapter 8
What measures can auditors take to restrict their exposure to liability?
- Disclaimer in auditor’s report (‘Bannerman clause’)
- Insurance
- Professional indemnity insurance
- Fidelity insurance
- Incorporation as limited liability partnership (LLP)
- Liability limitation agreement (an agreed ‘cap’)
- Proportional liability
See chapter 7
What conditions must be met for an auditor to owe a duty of care to a third party?
1. Foreseeability – the auditor knew or should have known that the third party would rely on the auditor’s work.
2. Proximity – the auditor’s relationship with the third party was sufficiently close.
3. It must be ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to impose a liability on the auditor.
See chapter 7
What are the three criteria for determining whether an auditor is responsible for negligent misstatements in audited financial statements?
1. A ‘duty of care’ was owed to the injured party.
2. There was a breach of that duty.
3. The injured party suffered financial loss as a result of the breach.
See chapter 7
To whom can the auditor report NOCLAR?
To those charged with governance (unless insignificant).
To an appropriate regulatory authority, even if not required by law.
To the shareholders, but only if the matter is material to the financial statements.
See chapter 6
What are the main effects that NOCLAR may have on financial statements?
Potential consequences of NOCLAR include:
– fines/penalties
– litigation/damages
– enforced discontinuation of business activities/expropriation of assets.
The main effects on the financial statements are therefore:
– understated liabilities
– non-disclosure of contingent liabilities
– inappropriate use of the going concern basis of accounting.
See chapter 6
What is ‘NOCLAR’?
Non-compliance with laws and regulations (i.e. acts of omission or commission, intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to prevailing laws or regulations).
See chapter 6
What is ‘tipping off’?
Tipping off’ is doing anything that might prejudice an investigation into actual or suspected money laundering activities.
See chapter 5
What types of offence fall within the scope of money laundering?
Concealing/disguising, converting or transferring money that is (or is suspected to be) the proceeds of crime.
Failure to report suspicion of money laundering.
Acquiring (obtaining), using and possessing (retaining) criminal property.
‘Tipping off’.
See chapter 5
What is ‘money laundering’?
Money laundering is a process whereby the proceeds of criminal activity are converted into assets appearing to have a legitimate origin.
See chapter 5
What is meant by the conceptual framework approach to independence?
The conceptual framework approach to independence means:
– Identify threats to independence
– Evaluate the significance of those threats
– Apply safeguards to reduce threats to acceptable levels or otherwise eliminate by not accepting or terminating the audit engagement.
See chapter 4
What is ‘independence’?
Independence comprises:
– Independence of mind (i.e. ability to express a conclusion that has not been compromised in any way)
– Independence in appearance (i.e. a reasonable and informed third party should conclude that the integrity, objectivity or professional scepticism of the audit firm/audit team member has not been compromised).
See chapter 4
What are the categories of threats to compliance with the fundamental principles of professional ethics?
- Self-interest
- Self-review
- Advocacy
- Familiarity
- Intimidation
See chapter 4
What are the fundamental principles of ACCA’s ‘Code of Ethics and Conduct’?
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Professional competence and due care
- Confidentiality
- Professional behaviour
See chapter 4
Why should an audit firm approached by a new prospective audit client communicate with the existing auditor?
To request information that is relevant to deciding whether there is any professional reason why they should not accept appointment.
See chapter 3
What information would usually be included in a tender for an audit?
Background information about the audit firm.
Relevant expertise and specialisms of the firm and individuals proposed for the audit team.
Scope of work proposed.
An outline of the audit approach including audit methodology, possible use of internal audit/CAATs etc.
Basis of fees.
See chapter 3
What is the fundamental principle of ‘professional behaviour’?
Professional behaviour’ means that the professional accountant:
– must how professional courtesy and consideration at all times
– should not bring the profession into disrepute
– should be honest and truthful (e.g. not make exaggerated claims or disparaging references to the work of others).
See chapter 3
What does the principle of ‘accountability’ mean?
The board should:
– present a fair, balanced and understandable assessment of the company’s position and prospects
– maintain sound risk management and internal control systems
– establish formal and transparent arrangements for applying corporate reporting, risk management and internal control principles and for maintaining an appropriate relationship with the company’s auditors.
See chapter 2
What is meant by a ‘comply or explain’ approach to corporate governance?
A regulatory authority (e.g. Stock Exchange) requires listed companies to:
– state that they have complied with corporate governance principles (e.g. under the UK Corporate Governance Code); or
– disclose and explain any non-compliance.
See chapter 2
What five areas are covered by the main principles of corporate governance according to best practice?
- Board Leadership and Company Purpose
- Division of Responsibilities
- Composition, Succession and Evaluation
- Audit, Risk and Internal Control
- Remuneration
See chapter 2
An assurance report concludes ‘Based on our work described in this report, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that internal control is not effective, in all material respects, based on … [criteria].’
What term describes this engagement and what term describes the conclusion expressed?
It is a ‘limited assurance’ engagement and the conclusion is expressed in ‘negative’ form.
See chapter 1
ACCA AAA flashcards are interactive and only work on line, flashcards are NOT downloadable/printable