- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks ago by
.
- Posts
Hi – just looking to see if anyone else has experienced this before?
I sat Tax in Sep-2024 sitting and missed the pass mark by 2% – no big deal, will pick myself up and try again.
But the odd part: ACCA feedback dashboard shows that I got 0% for Section B.
I know I 100% attempted every single question – dashboard shows I spent 35mins on this section.
By no means was I confident, but I got an average of 69% for Sections A & C (by % on dashboard).So – has anyone else ever managed to achieve this wonderous feat? Or is this something worth picking up with ACCA?
Thanks!
Hi jobjoob, I didn’t sit TX in September but sat AA & found your thread via googling the same thing.
I failed by 3%
I have a 0% for knowledge in object test skills which I’m confused about too.
Have you contacted ACCA?Hi T0402, sorry to hear that you’re in the same boat – bit of a headache isn’t it?
I haven’t contacted ACCA yet as am waiting for advice from my training provider. I will update here once I hear back from them.
But initial reading on ACCA’s website suggests an Administrative Review would be needed, and request deadline is 23 October.
Best of luck!
Hi Jibjoob, yes I just can’t see how that can be right?
I have read an older thread on Reddit where students had marginal fails but yet had scores on knowledge of 100% and it was due to system errors, however they didn’t specify an outcome of whether this impacted their result.
Who is your training provider? I am studying with BPP and have a review call on Friday with my coach so maybe I will ask their advice too.
Hi T0402, did you get any advice from BPP? My training provider is Babington but they haven’t responded yet.
Without having viewed your answers, it is difficult to judge whether your answers were genuinely incorrect (the ambiguous wording might have made things worse), or there had been technical glitch that nullied your work.
ACCA’s administrative review tend to be a money grabber scheme as they don’t change the results unless their summations didn’t work correctly. However, it might give you a piece of mind that at least the summations were correct.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.