• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Veryan Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › Veryan Co

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by Aynur02.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 11, 2024 at 6:14 pm #700087
    Aynur02
    Participant
    • Topics: 23
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Planning and Risk assessment
    Kaplan. Veryan Co (51-55)

    Select whether the following statements are consistent or not consistent with the
    movement in revenue.

    1.Cut-off of revenue is an audit risk — Consistent/ Not consistent

    2.Completeness of revenue is an audit risk — Consistent/ Not consistent

    3.Occurrence of revenue is an audit risk — Consistent/ Not consistent

    Hello sir, if possible can you explain this question easy way? i can’t solve these types of questions

    February 12, 2024 at 11:11 am #700110
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8453
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is not a past exam Q and I do not have the scenario – which is where you would need to look to understand the scenario.

    But to consider this type of Q more generally, you need to understand the assertions – please refer to Chapter 16 in our ntoes (it is less than 2 pages and really, really important to the AA exam).

    Revenue is a TRANSACTION – so the relevant assertions are as listed in s.2 – these include 1. cut-off, 2. completeness and 3. occurrence.

    Now suppose revenue appears to have increased by MORE than expected – i.e. risk is overstatement. That is consistent with risk of occurrence.

    Now suppose revenue appears to have increased by LESS than expected – i.e. risk is understatement. That is consistent with risk of completeness.

    Cut-off is a risk “either way” i.e. this year’s revenue recorded next year would be understatement this year, but next year’s revenue recorded this year would be overstatement – see s.5. of Chapter 20 in our notes for details.

    February 17, 2024 at 3:27 pm #700554
    Aynur02
    Participant
    • Topics: 23
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    thank you sir for explanation, i will look these chapters

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • yuanbao on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Sensitivity Analysis (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Inventory and IAS 2 Examples 1-3 – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Korankye on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Sensitivity Analysis (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • StefanHakim on Inventory and IAS 2 Examples 1-3 – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in