• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Magpie Co. Risk assessment

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › Magpie Co. Risk assessment

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 25, 2023 at 9:02 am #693953
    menpagalhoon
    Participant
    • Topics: 72
    • Replies: 35
    • ☆☆

    Scenario:

    It has been discovered that the soil relating to a batch of plants with a cost price of $0.1 m is contaminated, meaning that the plants may not be able to be sold. Tests are currently being carried out to determine whether the contamination can be remedied.

    Audit Risk identified:

    Inventory valuation:

    Inventory of $ 0.1 m has been noted as being damaged due to containing contaminated soil. In addition, the inventory holding period has increased from 28 days to 54 days meaning the company is retaining inventory longer than the prior year.

    If the contaminated soil can’t be remedied and the damaged inventory of $ 0.1 m is not written down to its net realizable value, inventory will be overstated, and cost of sales will be understated.

    Here I don’t understand how cost of sales will be understated. I think, closing inventory will be overstated because it would also be including the damaged inventory and hence cost of sales would be understated.

    Is it the right train of thought?

    October 25, 2023 at 12:40 pm #693962
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8291
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Welcome to my forum!

    Though I don’t understand what you don’t understand as you seem to concur that closing inventory would be overstated (because damaged inventory should be written down to NRV) and that means that cost of sales would be understated (because cogs = opening inventory + purchases – closing inventory).

    October 26, 2023 at 6:07 am #693997
    menpagalhoon
    Participant
    • Topics: 72
    • Replies: 35
    • ☆☆

    Thank you!

    October 26, 2023 at 7:04 am #694001
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8291
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Magpie Co. Risk assessment’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • bpop on Risk and uncertainty (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • kamo7293 on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • nevertoolate on CIMA BA2 – Regression analysis

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in