- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- Posts
Gloop is considering the further processing of its face foundation cream by adding an anti aging
compound . Exisitng sales are 25000 tubs of cream but this expected to increase by 25% if the
anti aging compound is added. The anti aging compound will cost $2.50 per tub and a royalty will be payable on sales revenue of 1.5% to the patent holder. Gloop also thinks that the selling’price of the cream will increase from $15 to $20 per tub. Other material costs will be unaffected at $6 per tub.Gloop operates a total absorption costing system and allocates fixed costs to products at the rate of $2 per $1 of sales revenue
How much better off financially will Gloop be if it decides to proceed with this idea?
$ _____________ improvementi got the calculation correct for Royalty and sales revenue.. But i didn’t understand the remaining calculations given in the kit.
Well, i have already typed the whole question. It’s in kaplan kit – Old edition (Until June 2017).
Why are you using such an old exam kit?
I think it’s
Incremental revenue = 25% x 25,000 x ($20 – $15) = $31,250
Incremental cost = $2.50 x 25,000 + 1.5% x $31,250 + $2 x $31,250 = $10,312.50
Therefore, the financial improvement will be:
$31,250 – $10,312.50 = $20,937.50
So, Gloop will be better off financially by $20,937.50 if it decides to proceed with the idea of adding the anti-aging compound to its face foundation cream.
I will say the same point – your exam kit is old and you are doing out of date PM questions.
I think it’s actually
Incremental revenue:
– Existing sales: 25,000 tubs x $15 per tub = $375,000
– Expected increase in sales: 25% x 25,000 tubs = 6,250 tubs
– New sales: 25,000 tubs + 6,250 tubs = 31,250 tubs
– New selling price: $20 per tub
– Incremental revenue: 6,250 tubs x $20 per tub = $125,000Incremental costs:
– Cost of anti-aging compound: $2.50 per tub x 31,250 tubs = $78,125
– Royalty payable: 1.5% x $20 per tub x 31,250 tubs = $9,375
– Incremental variable cost: $6 per tub x 31,250 tubs = $187,500
– Incremental fixed cost: $2 per $1 of sales revenue x $125,000 incremental revenue = $250,000Total incremental costs: $78,125 + $9,375 + $187,500 + $250,000 = $525,000
Financial improvement: Incremental revenue – Incremental costs = $125,000 – $525,000 = -$400,000
Therefore, Gloop will be worse off financially by $400,000 if it decides to proceed with the further processing idea.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.