- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- Posts
Hello Sir,
In case if the client is following a perpetual inventory count.
If the auditor wants to confirm the ending inventory in financial statement
What is the best substantive procedure to confirm that the perpetual counts agree with financial statement balances.
Thanks,
It’s not possible to say what is “best” and counts per the perpetual inventory records are only quantities – so cannot “agree with financial statement balances” which are $ amounts.
If a client uses perpetual inventory records as a basis for calculating the inventory amount for the financial statements, the auditor will need to check that “book” quantities are an accurate record of physical quantities. This will be confirmed by test counts of actual against book at the year end – the fact that the client is not performing a “full physical count” does not mean that the auditor cannot do such counts as are considered necessary for audit purposes.
Thanks Sir,
Is it a must that even with the perpetual counts there should a year end count ?
Thanks
Short answer – no – quite the contrary
In a perpetual inventory system, every goods movement in/out is recorded so inventory quantities are known at all times.
That does not mean that inventory is “perpetually counted” – some items might be counted every day, but some might be counted only weekly – or monthly.
The point is, that if the records are shown to be accurate there is no need to have a full physical count – which costs money (!)
Thanks a lot Sir,
But in the above reply you pointed out that the auditor can make a physical count when he sees necessarily .
So how that fits here.
Thanks.
The auditor can’t undertake a full physical count – that would have to be conducted by management – but there’s nothing to stop the auditor counting some items on a sample basis at the reporting date.
- The topic ‘Perpetual inventory’ is closed to new replies.