Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › 174 David and Angela (Kap)
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by Tax Tutor.
- AuthorPosts
- February 15, 2022 at 10:41 am #648656
Hello sir,
Why in the following ques 3years for any reason is deemed to be occupied is ignoredhttps://photos.app.goo.gl/66fNKjeTRjQTRq6z8
On 30 September 2020 David and Angela sold a house for £381,900. The house had been
purchased on 1 October 2000 for £86,000.
David and Angela occupied the house as their main residence from the date of purchase until
31 March 2004. The house was then unoccupied between 1 April 2004 and 31 December
2007 due to Angela being required by her employer to work elsewhere in the United
Kingdom.
From 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2014 David and Angela again occupied the house as
their main residence. The house was then unoccupied until it was sold on 30 September
2020.
Throughout the period 1 October 2000 to 30 September 2020 David and Angela did not have
any other main residence.February 18, 2022 at 4:18 pm #648876There is no actual period of occupation after this period of absence from the property and prior to sale – therefore 3 years for any reason not available
February 19, 2022 at 5:43 am #648890So sir,
Does it mean that
3 years for any reason is available for
Ineligible occupation rather than for absence or no occupation at all.?February 20, 2022 at 11:53 am #648966No – it refers to a period of absence that will be treated as deemed occupation
Have you watched the lecture along with working through the relevant section of the study notes?February 20, 2022 at 12:08 pm #648971From 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2014 David and Angela again occupied the house as
their main residence. The house was then unoccupied until it was sold on 30 September
2020.What about the the periods from 31st dec 2014–Until sold on 30th September..
2020Why is inoccupancy not deemed to be occupied under
“3years is deemed to be occupied for any reason”February 21, 2022 at 8:16 am #649032Sorry sir got confused a bit..
But now i understood that since there was no “re occupation”
The deemed occupancy is irrelevantFebruary 22, 2022 at 2:29 pm #649112Correct
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.