• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

March/June 2021 Sample Answers Qn3

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › March/June 2021 Sample Answers Qn3

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 10, 2021 at 6:43 am #630965
    checkling
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi Sir,

    1. For the future contract will it be correct if the calculation for under-hedge be ok?

    For the question the Number of contracts = MR96,461,668/MR500,000 = 192·9, say 193
    For general approach do we always over hedge when is decimal point is more than 0.5?

    2. For the calculation on the forward contract.

    Exchange rates (quoted as US dollar per Malaysian Ringgit US$/MR1)
    Spot 0·2355 – 0·2358
    Four months forward 0·2370 – 0·2374

    why use 0.2374 and not 0.2370?

    Thanks in advance for your reply.

    Regards,
    Check Ling

    August 10, 2021 at 8:17 am #630987
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. Do not simply learn a rule (because it depends on whether they are receiving or paying the other currency) but think through the logic.
    The are hedging a net receipt of $22.9M which would need 192.9 contracts. By using 193 contracts they are hedging a receipt bigger than $22.9M and therefore they are hedging more than they will actually be receiving – so they have over hedged.

    2. Because the futures will convert more $’s than they actually are going to receive, then will need to buy the extra $’s and the forward rate for buying $’s is 0.2370 (and the answer has used 0.2370 for this part).

    (The 0.2374 that has been used for the futures themselves is the lock-in rate. It is only by coincidence that this happens to be the same as one of the forward rates.)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • SEARELE on Bank Reconciliations (b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • hasnaraw on Group SFP – Basic consolidation (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Aadhi69 on Groups – Other points – ACCA SBR
  • Aadhi69 on Basic group structures – SFP workings and adjustments – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Hopemas on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in