• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

oscar co s/d 18.

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › oscar co s/d 18.

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 9, 2021 at 5:47 pm #609860
    draiells
    Member
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir for option 2, can you explain how the component working for finance costs in answer key different from the below working:

    = Increased Finance cost = (.8*28000000*30/365)*9%
    Reduced overdraft cause =( 5370000-.2*28000000*30/365) * 7%

    please sir explain :/ i did the above approach im so confused by numbers and working in answer key for finance costs.

    February 10, 2021 at 9:30 am #609890
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54821
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    For both options 1 and 2, the average receivables will fall from 5,370,000 to 2,301,370 (as in the answers workings for Option 1) because the collection period will fall to 30 days. So there is a saving of overdraft interest of 214,804 (again, as in the workings for Option 1).

    However, with Option 2, the factor will give an advance of 80% of the new receivables (2,301,370) and so the company will received 80% of the amount immediately instead of having to wait 30 days. They will therefore have an extra saving of 7% overdraft interest on this amount, but instead will have to pay 9% of the same amount to the factor – so an extra 2%.

    February 10, 2021 at 12:56 pm #609922
    draiells
    Member
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    = Increased Finance cost = (.8*28000000*30/365)*9%
    Reduced overdraft cost =( 5370000-.2*28000000*30/365) * 7%

    I’m getting the same answer with this, is this approach fine too?

    February 10, 2021 at 2:27 pm #609930
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54821
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that is fine. It does not matter which way you show your workings 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘oscar co s/d 18.’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan CIMA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Leseg on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • Winz on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Sharia law – ACCA LW Global
  • AhmedRiflan on Sharia law – ACCA LW Global
  • mohamed0Ragab141 on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in