• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Q1 Kutchen (Specimen Exam 1) (Sep 2018)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Q1 Kutchen (Specimen Exam 1) (Sep 2018)

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 3, 2020 at 6:50 pm #583300
    mmkhan7
    Participant
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi,

    My question relates to the acquisition and disposal of Niche in the question.

    The question is as follows:

    Kutchen had purchased an 80% interest in Niche for $40 million on 1 January 20X6 when the fair value of the identifiable net assets was $44 million. The partial goodwill method had been used to calculate goodwill and an impairment of $2 million had arisen in the year ended 31 December 20X6. The holding in Niche was sold for $50 million on 31 December 20X6. The carrying value of Niche’s identifiable net assets other than goodwill was $60 million at the date of sale. Kutchen had carried the investment in Niche at cost. The finance director calculated that a gain arose of $2 million on the sale of Niche in the group financial statements being the sale proceeds of $50 million less $48 million being their share of the identifiable net assets at the date of sale (80% of $60 million). This was credited to retained earnings.

    The answer given is as follows:

    The finance director had calculated that a gain arose of $2 million on the sale of Niche in the group financial statements being the sale proceeds of $50 million less $48 million which is their share of the identifiable net assets at the date of sale (80% of $60 million). However, the calculation of the gain or loss on sale should have been the difference between the carrying amount of the net assets (including any unimpaired goodwill) disposed of and any proceeds received. The calculation of net assets will include the appropriate portion of cumulative exchange differences and any other amounts recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity. Additionally, the loss on sale should have been reported as a loss in profit or loss attributable to the parent.

    The gain on the sale of Niche should have been recorded as follows:

    Sale proceeds $50m
    Less Share of identifiable net assets at date of disposal (80% x $60 million) = (48)
    Less Goodwill ($40m – (80% of $44m) – impairment $2m) (2·8)
    –––––
    Loss on sale of Niche recognised in group profit or loss (0·8)
    –––––

    I would kindly like to ask you the following:

    (1) Why have they deducted the “share of identifiable net assets”? Because when a subsidiary is disposed, we deconsolidate the goodwill, NCI and 100% of the net assets of the subsidiary.

    (2) In the question, it is said that the partial goodwill method was used. I calculated an NCI of $8.8m ($44m × 20%) during the goodwill calculation. However, no NCI is included in the above answer. Could you please explain why?

    In contrast, here is my calculation which I did following BPP’s method:

    Sales Proceeds $50m
    (Less) Share of Consolidated Carrying Amount @ Date Control Lost:
    Net Assets @ Date control lost $60m
    Goodwill @ Date control lost $2.8m
    NCI @ Date control lost ($8.8m)
    –––––
    Loss on disposal $4m
    –––––

    Thanks

    September 4, 2020 at 11:43 am #583413
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3396
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Your method is fine. In fact it is better to do that in the exam.

    But your NCI should be 20% of the net assets at disposal date not the acquisition date. 20% of 60 would be 12.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 14 Questions More variance analysis
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • bizuayehuy on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • sokleng on FM Chapter 7 Questions – Investment appraisal – methods
  • Annabelayinloya on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in