• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

non recourse..IFRS 9

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › non recourse..IFRS 9

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 14, 2020 at 10:34 am #580523
    misbahkiran
    Participant
    • Topics: 109
    • Replies: 194
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi Sir
    need little clarification on this

    if 80 percent of trade receivable of 40 million $ is sold to factoring company with non recourse option. but company guarantees that it will pay a factor 9 percent of each receivable not recovered.company believe that customer represents low credit risk so probability of default is low. lets say fair value of the guarantee is 50,000$

    should we derecognise financial assest?

    Guarantee will be recognized as liability but what about continue involvement in the collection which represents 9 percent. should we need to recognize financial assest of that continue involvement as per IFRS 9 for the amount lower of carrying vale of Financial assest or fair value of amount guarantee to be paid which is 9 percent?

    will it be like

    Dr cash 32
    Dr profit and loss 4.9

    Dr financial assest – continue involvement 3.6(9 percent of 40 amount to be paid to factor which is not certain in this case as its just a percentage of unrecoverable amount)

    Cr financial assest 40
    Cr financial liability 0.5

    or there is no need to recognize the financial assest as probability of default is low and we assume that risk and reward and control both are transferred? and we will recognize loss of 8 million?

    August 14, 2020 at 1:51 pm #580544
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3411
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I suspect there may be a case for partial derecognition. You could refer to the transfers with guarantees section of the link below:

    https://ifrscommunity.com/knowledge-base/derecognition-of-financial-assets/

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • umangkumbhat on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • ahmadhoney on How to register with ACCA?
  • John Moffat on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • osman-the-zephyr@ on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • adebusola on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in