- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- Posts
Dear Sir
For the Amberle case, why is the subsidy benefit calculated as:
$80m x (0.08 – 0.031) x 70% x 3.312?What is the reason for multiplying by 70%?
thanks
In future you must ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum if you want me to answer. This forum is for students to help each other.
The 70% is to account for the tax of 30%.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.