Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › ACCA – Past Exam – March 2019
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
- AuthorPosts
- June 27, 2020 at 4:12 pm #574821
Dear Sir,
I would like to ask about the question from ACCA past exam:
“3 (a) (i) Crypto operates in the power industry, and owns 45% of the voting shares in Kurran. Kurran has four other investors which own the remaining 55% of its voting shares and are all technology companies. The largest of these holdings is 18%. Kurran is a property developer and purchases property for its renovation potential and
subsequent disposal. Crypto has no expertise in this area and is not involved in the renovation or disposal of the property.
The board of directors of Kurran makes all of the major decisions but Crypto can nominate up to four of the eight board members. Each of the remaining four board members are nominated by each of the other investors. Any major decisions require all board members to vote and for there to be a clear majority. Thus, Crypto has effectively the power of veto on any major decision. There is no shareholder agreement as to
how Kurran should be operated or who will make the operating decisions for Kurran. The directors of Crypto believe that Crypto has joint control over Kurran because it is the major shareholder and holds the power of veto over major decisions.
The directors of Crypto would like advice as to whether or not they should account for Kurran under IFRS® 11 Joint Arrangements.”I understand that IFRS 11 defines joint control as “Joint control involves the contractually agreed sharing of control and arrangements subject to joint control are classified as either a joint venture (representing a share of net assets and equity accounted) or a joint operation (representing rights to assets and obligations for liabilities, accounted for accordingly).”
Referring to the questions, as the control decision is made by Kuran’s boards of directors of which up to four members could be decided by Cryto. Does it mean that in case Cryto nominated 4 board members accounting for half of the members of Kuran, it could share the control with 4 members from 4 other investors? So why Cryto cannot account for Kurran under IFRS11?
June 28, 2020 at 3:58 pm #574871Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. [IFRS 11:7]
So, if there is contractually agreed sharing of control and each party has the right of veto, it will be a JA. And, if there isn’t, it won’t be.
June 29, 2020 at 4:21 am #574902@stephenwidberg said:
Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. [IFRS 11:7]So, if there is contractually agreed sharing of control and each party has the right of veto, it will be a JA. And, if there isn’t, it won’t be.
Dear Sir,
based on your above response, I understand that as the question mentions:
“There is no shareholder agreement as to how Kurran should be operated or who will make the operating decisions for Kurran” => It means that the contractually agree sharing of control does not exists so Kurran is not JA of Crypto. Is it right?
June 29, 2020 at 12:08 pm #5750851. No agreement AND
2. Other parties do not have right of vetoSo that’s 2 reasons why it’s not a JA
Bear in mind that a candidate who wrote down the relevant knowledge but applied it incorrectly would get most of the marks.
What lets people down is if they show no knowledge.
Knowledge 50%
Application 25%
Calculations 25% - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.