• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Need clarification regarding an adjustment for Moby Co

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › Need clarification regarding an adjustment for Moby Co

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years ago by racheldias9491.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 3, 2020 at 11:36 pm #569884
    racheldias9491
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Hello Friends,

    The following is an adjustment I find a bit confusing.

    “Moby co received a quotation from the property insurer of $400,000, the directors could not believe that it had increased so much and felt that it would be less expensive to ‘self insure’. Accordingly they charged the amount $400,000 to administrative expenses and credited the same to insurance provision. During the year they incurred damage expenses to a previously insured property of $250,000 which the debited to the insurance provision.”

    In the solution the amount $150,000 is being deducted from the overall administrative expenses given in the trial balance.

    Can anyone tell me what exactly is going on here? I checked with my tutor, they told me that this isn’t a provision but rather an amount set aside to cover for the premium but since the company decided to do away with the insurance policy they deducted the balance 150000 from administrative expenses.

    But I feel that the company actually intended to set aside $400,000 as a provision which according to IAS 37 is not permitted since it is not an obligation hence only 150,000 is being deducted from expenses or added back to profit. While the $250,000 has already been written off.
    But what i find a bit unusual in the question is the fact that they used the same amount of $400,000 to set aside as an allowance which they felt was expensive.

    Would appreciate if anyone could clarify this for me.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • ahmadhoney on ACCA Advanced Audit and Assurance (AAA) The Audit Report 3: Types of Audit Report
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Ken Garrett on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • John Moffat on AA Chapter 7 Questions

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in