Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › CAPM Part 1 and 2
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- March 23, 2020 at 11:47 pm #565598
Sir,
you said in your lecture of CAPM Part 1 that while measuring investor’s required return we consider only the systematic risks, as we assume the company specific risks have been taken care of by portfolio management.And beta is the measurement of the level of systematic risk of a company compared to the market which eventually determines investor’s required return.
On the other hand,gearing is a company specific risk.So, how can beta, a measurement of systematic risk which determines return, can be effected by gearing, which is a company specific risk.
If so, then this means, investor’s required return is indirectly effected by company specific risk, which doesn’t match with what you said earlier. I’m getting confused. Could you please make it clear to me?March 24, 2020 at 7:42 am #565615Company specific risk is risk of the type of business that is specific to the company.
Gearing is not like that. How the company is financed does not affect the riskiness of the business itself. What gearing does is increase the systematic risk for the shareholders.Therefore the equity beta for a business is greater than the asset beta for the business due to the level of gearing.
March 24, 2020 at 12:20 pm #565637oh, now i get it. thanks a lot ,sir.
March 24, 2020 at 3:03 pm #565650You are welcome 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘CAPM Part 1 and 2’ is closed to new replies.