• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Montreal & Co – Mar Jun 2016

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Montreal & Co – Mar Jun 2016

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 10, 2020 at 3:52 pm #557684
    salman7
    Participant
    • Topics: 77
    • Replies: 36
    • ☆☆

    Hello sir,

    I have a specific question on BBP’s solution for Montreal & Co – Jun 2016. The question says that both of the subsidiaries were acquired as wholly owned subsidiaries many years ago. The answer says “All consolidation adjustments should be reviewed and recalculated, for example pre-acquisition reserves and goodwill for subsidiaries, along with any fair value adjustments.” in part c – which is “Audit procedures that should be performed on the consolidation process.”

    My question is why we need to audit the pre-acquisition reserves? It was done many years ago so irrelevant and for current year audit, we will just check the balances are brought forward properly.

    Thanks alot and regards,

    January 10, 2020 at 5:17 pm #557689
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 135
    • Replies: 8328
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    As you describe it this part (c) was not part of the original Q. It does sound a bit “generic” and if an exam Q says “many years ago” I would similarly assume the acquisition, per se, to be irrelevant (which is probably why the audit of the consolidation was not an original requirement). I guess it’s possible that there could still be a FV adjustment though this would be a minor point in the absence of some clear pointer towards it.
    Unless there is any specific mention of some issue with reserves on prior year consolidations (I can’t image what though) I suggest you ignore.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • ZaidRaza on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • mrjonbain on Chapter 11 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • james33 on Chapter 11 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • John Moffat on Group Accounts The Consolidated Income Statement (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 2 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in