• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

material costing

Forums › FIA Forums › material costing

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by AvatarKen Garrett.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 28, 2019 at 7:48 pm #551100
    Avatarshahmeer22
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Which of the following statements would be TRUE if raw materials prices were rising?

    1) FIFO would give a lower profit figure than LIFO
    2) Under LIFO production costs would be lower than under FIFO
    3) Periodic weighted average would give a lower closing inventory valuation than the
    cumulative weighted average pricing method
    4) LIFO would give a lower closing inventory valuation than FIFO

    The correct answer is 4 but it seems ans 3 is also correct am i right?
    it comes in the hub of acca..ma1

    October 29, 2019 at 5:32 pm #551158
    AvatarKen Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10656
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    4 is not the correct answer. Lifo means that higher priced inventory is used first, leaving earlier, lower priced inventory in stocks.

    October 30, 2019 at 4:20 pm #551251
    Avatarshahmeer22
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    yes u r right…and ans 4 is also saying the same thing..please read througly..and this is acca’s question no chance of wrong

    November 5, 2019 at 11:24 pm #551641
    AvatarKen Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10656
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, you are correct. Sorry for my error.

    In 3 the WA periodic cost is calculated right over the period, so will always include effects of old, low-priced purchases.

    The WA cumulative cost is calculated every time there is an addition of goods. However it would be possible for invemtory to have been reduced to zero at somepoint so that the calculation starts anew having only recent relatively expensive purchases in it.

    Therefore, there is a chance that

    WA cumulative > WA periodic. Or
    WA periodic < WA cumulative

    So it looks as though 3 is right too, as you suggested.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • oabilentatiwa on Process Technology and Quality control – CIMA E1
  • Inspire on SWOT Analysis – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • Casair on Statement of cash flows – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Mellytac on Sales Mix Variance – Variance analysis – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • newspring.kr on Group SFP – Example (PUPs) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in