• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

mid acq of a subsidary

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › mid acq of a subsidary

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 19, 2012 at 7:28 am #52280
    Vipin
    Member
    • Topics: 151
    • Replies: 374
    • ☆☆☆☆

    q1 dec 09,
    on 1 april 2009 pander purchased 80% of the equity shars in Salava. profit of salva for the year ended 30th sept is 21m. Immediately after its acquisition of salva, pandar invested $50 m in an 8% loan note from salva.

    so, salva’s profit is split as pre and post acq.
    pre acq is (21+2)/2 =11.5 m
    and post acq is 11.5 -2=9.5 m
    2m being intra group interest.

    my doubt is , 85 loan instead of taking from parent if they had taken from a third party.
    what would became pre and post acq? will the calculation be the same? this is my doubt.

    April 19, 2012 at 10:15 am #96454
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No, the post acq profit is still going to be 9.5. Before the loan interest expense, the profit for the year would have been 23, so an 11.5 / 11.5 split.

    If salva had borrowed 50m from outside, it would have paid 2m. So it doesn’t matter from whom the 2m is borrowed, the second period ( ie post acq period ) would still have been 11.5 – 2m loan interest.

    The impact of borrowing from within the group is that finance charges and investment income of 2m will be ignored for the purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Income and the cancellation of 50m investment and 50m long term debt will be applicable.

    You may be asking what the position would be if there was NO borrowing of 50m neither from within nor without the group ie salva did not borrow any money. In that situation, there would be no 2m deduction against this post acquisition profits and the profit for the year of 23m would be split 11.5 / 11.5

    Hope that helps

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • o1lim on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in