- This topic has 48 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
.
- Posts
Post your comments about December 2011 F4 exam.
What came up? How did you do? How did this paper compare to previous exams?Vote in our Instant Poll
[polldaddy poll="5751845"]- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
can any 1 tell me how was f4 exam question was tdy??
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
i am also gonna appear in june for f4
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
Q1 –
(a) case law
(b) legistlation and delegated legislationQ3-
(a)Terms
(b)Conditions
(c)Warranty
(d)Innominate termsQ4 Negligence, Auditors duty of care
Q5
(a) (i)board chairman
(ii) managing director / chief executive(b) ordinary shares and preference shares.
Q6
Non executive directors
shadow director
and something else forgot.Q7 Redundancy
Q8 Invitation to treat, counter offer (scenario based)
Q9 company law forgot what it was.
Q10 Money laundering scenario based
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
All gud except corporate governance of chairman and chief executive director. Shadow director and managing director. 🙁
wtf examiner doing wt actually q9 was??
remaining exam was fair nt very tough…….- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
Q9 got me too. No idea what it was.
Do you remember what was Q2?- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Easy Paper………………….q # 1 based on spelling mistakes…………2nd on consolidation and last on strategic position analysis……………………lolxzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
@wahidshraboni:Q9 was on restraint of trade..
You must elaborate on what are the restraint of trade that is for e.g cannot solicit customers,employee must not use the employers trade secret after leaving employment,or commencing a competing business against his previous employer..thats what happen in that case..I just say it was a very easy paper overall compared to the june paper..Morever there was
nt fabulous although tried to best of mine abilities based upon the learning of CBL.
I thought Q9 was lifting the veil… like in the Gilford Motors case… Has anybody written about this?
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
Easiest F4 paper in the history!!!
Hi all,
Hope it went well for you all. I stuggled with question 9 too. There was a case similar to that of 9 (b) I did mention it but can’t remember what it is right now. It was legal obligations and lifting the corporate veild. Thankfully I attempted all the questions so lets see what happens. Does anyone know the date the results come out?
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
@riccarem :no it was on restraints on trade you have the different restraints of trade that exist like I said above the employee must not use the trade secret of the employer after leaving employment..So in that case the employer can take action against his previous employee…
i thought question 9 was based on exclusion clauses?……fudge cake…..i must have messed that one up
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
F4 was very easy this time compares to june etc..
@shad77: Hi mate, are you sure that this is not a Lifting the Veil case? To me it seems the same as Gilford Motors… Just need some reassurance… Thanks
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
@riccarem :Question 9a was on lifting the veil man and like you said you have to include the case gilford motor v horne..but in 9b you have to explain the different types of restriction on trade…
@riccarem – I also thought 9 b was lifting the corporate veil. I mentioned the Gilford case. Was it Gilford Motors v Ford?
In 9a I mentioned the Salomon case briefly. I also included creditors compulsory liquidity – god knows why. This question was the last one I attempted so it was rushed!!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.