An example was given by the tutor in chapter 2 about the above topic where he concluded that the tax saving was £1300 after property income had been split according to actual ownership of shares. My question is, “Why did he consider the difference in the taxable income of the wife as £4000 instead of the £3000 as in the previous illustration where the husband had a salary?
If you can tell me exactly which lecture you are concerned with and the specific part of that lecture you are referring to in terms of the timing within the lecture I will check it for you