• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

June 2018

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › June 2018

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 15, 2018 at 10:47 pm #478667
    maxpopper
    Member
    • Topics: 177
    • Replies: 132
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir in june 2018 joint probability question, how the examiner has caculated NPV. I cannot understand. Can you please explain. Rest of the things I have understood in this question , except NPV

    October 16, 2018 at 6:25 am #478693
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54726
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The year 1 and year 2 flows have both been discounted to get the present values.

    Then all the various possibilities have been listed (i.e. 1M in the first year and 2M in the second year; 1M in the first year and 3M in the second year; and so on) and the PV’s added up to get the total PV for each possibility.

    Then the expected PV has been calculated in the same way as in Paper F5 – by multiplying the total PV of each possibility by the probability of each possibility, and adding them up.

    October 16, 2018 at 2:19 pm #478757
    maxpopper
    Member
    • Topics: 177
    • Replies: 132
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir the area which is confusing me is that

    like in the first row of the table they have written 893 as PV of Y1 cashflow, 0.1 as prob, 1594 as PV of Y2 cashflow, 0.3 as prob, 2487 as total PV, 0.03 as joint prob, 74.6 as (PV x JP)

    I have understood all these figs. What I have not understood is -1013 value which is written in NPV, which figs they have used to find -1013?

    October 16, 2018 at 5:24 pm #478802
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54726
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    2,487 is the total PV, if you subtract the initial cost of 3,500, then the NPV is -1,013.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • johnmu on Introduction to Pricing, Cost plus pricing – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • priyagolani14 on FA Chapter 4 Questions Accruals and Prepayments
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 5 Questions IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
  • John Moffat on Business Documentation – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • JocelynChen on Goodwill, NCI and group retained earnings – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in