• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Multi Item (weighted) index numbers

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Multi Item (weighted) index numbers

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 14, 2018 at 4:54 pm #478015
    clairejpierce
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hello

    I have watched your videos on index numbers as i watch all of your videos. I am also using kaplan as this has been funded for me but i’m confused by the multi item example in kaplan. I tried using the Lasperye method to the kaplan example and it doesn’t work, so what am i missing.

    I understand both methods completely but the question in the kaplan states the following:

    Selling Price 20X2 (£) Selling price 20X3 (£)

    Product A 2 3

    Product B 9 10

    Product C 25 30

    Quantity

    Product A 4,000

    Product B 3,000

    Product C 1,000

    The above is exactly the same as Laspeyre so i have taken the selling price multiplied by the quantity for both years. The total for 20X2 = 60,000 and the total for 20X3 = 72,000. Following Las method i have divided 72,000/60,000 = 1.2 * 100 = 120.

    So i have a price index for 20X3 of 120

    However, Kaplan have a price index of 131.6% and calculate it as follows

    A 3/2*100 = 150 * 4000 = 600,000

    B 10/9*100 = 111 * 3000 = 333,000

    C 30/25*100 = 120 * 1000 = 120,000

    They then take the total price index * quantity total which is 1,053,000 and divide by total quantity which is 8000 which = 131.6

    Is this a completely different method to Laspeyre as there is no mention of Laspeyre in the kaplan book and the above is called multi item weighted index.

    I am very confused by this so any help would be very much appreciated as i applied the multi weighted method to your example but i cannot get the same index, which makes me think they are totally different

    Kind regards

    Claire

    October 15, 2018 at 12:38 pm #478426
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I do not have the Kaplan books (only the BPP Revision Kit) and so I cannot see the specific example.

    However I would not worry about it – for the exam it is Laspeyre and Paasche price and quantity index numbers that are examined 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in