- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › PURP within NCI calculation for consolidated P&L
Hi,
I have the following statement:
1. After the acquisition of Sentinel of 01.10.20×0, P transferred to S an item of plant with a carrying amount of 4 millions at an agreed value of 5 millions. At this date the item had a remaining life of 2.5 years. Prodigal had included the profit on this transfer as a reduction in its depreciation costs.
Why this depreciation should be added back to the calculation for NCI?
Thank you
I believe that the excess depreciation is in the subsidiary’s books and hence the need to allocate the NCI (which is a separate ‘entity’) its share. Remember, the reason we would eliminate it from the consolidated SOPL is because we treat the parent and subsidiary as one entity; and there cannot be transfers above carrying amount.