Sir, In St Albans City and District Council V International Computers Ltd,as claimant was aware of the existence and extent of exclusion clause so in this way if we see then exclusion clause is valid but because defendant had insurance of $50 Million themselves,so because of this reason the exclusion clause was deemed to be unreasonable? And was defendant in stronger bargaining position? How we analyse that who is stronger bargaining position?
How to see who is stronger – that’s for the Court to decide
In an exam question it will be startlingly obvious
OK?
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
The topic ‘Insurance and Bargaining– St Albans city’ is closed to new replies.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy