• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Executor and Successor

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Executor and Successor

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2017 at 8:25 am #419581
    humai
    Participant
    • Topics: 757
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Sir, one of the exceptions of privity of contract is that ,can an executor enforce contracts made by the deceased OR can a successor enforce contracts made by the deceased?

    December 2, 2017 at 9:09 am #419597
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is not a question that you have dreamed up for yourself

    This sounds like a question arising from something written in a Kaplan text

    So what does Kaplan say about enforceability by executors and successors

    According to the decision in the case Beswick v Beswick it was allowed for an executor to sue to enforce a contract term in a contract entered into by the deceased and, at the time, it was otherwise mot possible for a beneficiary to sue in that same situation

    Since the introduction of the Contracts (Rights of Thrid Parties)Act of 1999, Mrs Beswick would now be able to sue on her own behalf as successor rather than as executor

    Now tell me, what does Kaplan say?

    December 2, 2017 at 10:34 am #419633
    humai
    Participant
    • Topics: 757
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    So sir you mean to say that in Beswick v Beswick (1967), it was held that she could sue in her capacity as Executor rather than as Successor?

    However after the introduction of the Contracts (Rights of Thrid Parties)Act of 1999, She could now ALSO sue in her capacity as successor ?

    December 2, 2017 at 4:35 pm #419726
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes

    Yes, except she wouldn’t “also” sue … that sounds like two separate legal cases. Auntie Beswick, if the case had been after 1999, would sue as a successor. But the case was pre 1999 so she could sue only as executrix

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Executor and Successor’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • roksy on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • Fola94 on Presentation of financial statements – introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in