Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Revaluation of PPE
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- November 12, 2017 at 2:48 pm #415409
ABC uses the revaluation model for land and buildings. The buildings were acquired on 1 July 2006 and have a total useful life of 49 years. The nominal ledger balance of land $300 million and buildings $572 million represents on 30 June 2012. The balance of the revaluation reserve of $150.05 million solely represents accumulated revaluation surpluses from land up to 1 July 2015. Depreciation on buildings should be presented in distribution costs.
On 1 July 2015, the land valued at $200 million and the buildings at $500 million respectively and the revised useful life of the buildings is 39 years
Is it making entries like this?
Dr. Reversal revaluation surpluses- Land $150.05
Cr. Land ($300 – $200) $100
Cr. Revaluation Surplus $50.05November 12, 2017 at 3:24 pm #415418The questions I have to ask are:
1) is this another part of your assignment?, and
2) what did Omega do with the other $132,620,000 that they borrowed? and
3) what is Omega’s accounting reference date? and
4) do you believe that I can answer questions when full information is not given to me?
November 12, 2017 at 3:49 pm #415427Sorry, I edit my question. I type a wrong question. Could you help me, please? thank you.
November 12, 2017 at 4:59 pm #415433The building has not been revalued (“The balance of the revaluation reserve of $150.05 million solely represents accumulated revaluation surpluses from land up to 1 July 2015”) so they’ve been depreciated for 6 out of 49 years down to $572 million
We need to find the depreciation for the year to 30 June, 2013 and that should be 1/43 of $572 but that looks to be an awful figure ($13.3)
In fact, it looks to me like the useful life of the buildings should be 50 years and not 49 as you have posted
That would give us $13 annual depreciation which is much more likely than $13.302325
So assuming that you have (again) mistyped the question, then we need to charge depreciation on the buildings for 2013 and the carrying value will therefore fall to $559 and that further means that there is an impairment on the buildings of $59 million
For the land the carrying value needs to be reduced from $300 down to $200 so there is a reduction of the revaluation reserve from $150.05 down to $50.05
If the question asks ONLY for the entries for the land, then there’s no need for:
Dr. Reversal revaluation surpluses- Land $150.05
Cr. Land ($300 – $200) $100
Cr. Revaluation Surplus $50.05What’s the matter with simply:
Dr Revaluation Reserve $100
Cr Land $100????
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Revaluation of PPE’ is closed to new replies.