• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Identifying the bottleneck for multi-process product

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Identifying the bottleneck for multi-process product

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 11, 2017 at 9:48 am #415226
    Avatarsxhawty
    Member
    • Topics: 56
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆☆

    Hi sir, could you please help me out with this example that is in my kaplan book. They have not explained how to get the bottleneck for it.

    After manufacture, the heater has to go through 3 process Assembly, quality control and packaging.

    Sales price p.u: 2.25, Materials: 0.81.
    machine time p.u:
    Assembly: 3minutes
    QC: 4min.
    Packaging: 5minutes.
    Total sales demand: 1500 units.
    Maximum hours available for each machine are 150 (Assembly), 170(Quality Control), 250 (Packaging).
    Operating expense are $4000
    It says in the answer to establish the bottleneck; “The assembly hours needed for maximum production are 143.75. Which is less than the 150 hrs available. The QC hrs needed for maximum production are 178.33, which is greater than the 170hrs available. So QC is our bottleneck. The packaging hours needed for maximum production are 234.17. This is less than the 250hrs available.”

    My question is, how did we get the 143.75, 178.33 & 234.17 hrs? The solution wasn’t in the book. Could you clear it out for me Sir. Thanks.

    November 11, 2017 at 10:10 am #415233
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54836
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I don’t have the Kaplan book and so I can’t look at the actual question, but are you sure that you have copied it correctly (and included all of the information – are you sure that there are no other products being produced as well?)?

    If you have copied it all correctly, then I have no idea how they have arrived at the figures in their answer. If they are only producing heaters, then for maximum production of 1,500 units the time needed in assembly would be 1,500 x 3 / 60 = 75 hours.

    I can only assume that they are producing other products as well, in which case we obviously need the total time for maximum production of all the products (but you would have to be told about the other products in the question).

    November 11, 2017 at 10:58 am #415240
    Avatarsxhawty
    Member
    • Topics: 56
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆☆

    Sorry, they do have 3 products. The ones ive given above is for Product B.

    For product A: SP p.u = $2, materials = $0.50.
    Machine time p.u in minutes: assembly 2, QC 3, Packaging 4.
    Demand is 1000 units.

    For product C: SP p.u $1.75, materials $0.35.
    Machine time p.u in minutes: assembly 2.5, QC 2, packaging is.
    Demand is 850 units
    How do we get the bottleneck?

    November 12, 2017 at 10:00 am #415353
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54836
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The total hours needed in assembly for maximum production is as follows:

    (1,000 units x 2 minutes) + (1500 units x 3 minutes) + (850 units x 2.5 minutes) = 8,625 minutes

    8,625 minutes = 8625/60 = 143.75 hours. There are 150 hours available in assembly and therefore assembly is not the bottleneck.

    If you do the same for QC and for finishing, the rest of the answer you should now make sense.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AllisonHoang on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • zuluthanda1@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in

Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
Settings Accept all
Cookies
Choose what kind of cookies to accept. Your choice will be saved for one year. Read our cookie policy
  • Necessary
    These cookies are not optional. They are needed for the website to function.
  • Statistics
    In order for us to improve the website's functionality and structure, based on how the website is used.
  • Experience
    In order for our website to perform as well as possible during your visit. If you refuse these cookies, some functionality will disappear from the website.
  • Marketing
    By sharing your interests and behavior as you visit our site, you increase the chance of seeing personalized content and offers.
Save Accept all