” Expected values ignores the risk associated with the decision.”
-Could you explain how this statement is correct? Does EV recognises the risk in the decision based on the probabilities of different possible outcomes?
I explain this in my lectures when I state that using expected values is risk neutral.
A profit of either 90 or 110 (which 0.5 probabilities) will have exactly the same expected value as a profit of either 50 or 150 (with 0.5 probabilities) but the second case is much more risky because the spread of the possible results is much more.
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
The topic ‘expected values’ is closed to new replies.